Uniform Circular Motion and centripetal force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on uniform circular motion (UCM) and the role of centripetal force in an experiment involving a stopper and a weight. It highlights the contradiction in maintaining a horizontal circular path, as the vertical tension required to support the stopper's mass cannot be achieved. The participants agree that a horizontal circle is not physically feasible without vertical tension. The need for experimental precision is questioned, suggesting a deeper understanding of the forces at play is necessary. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of UCM and the conditions required for stability in circular motion.
BlueEight
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img.skitch.com/20091201-pxecs3d574itggpejybhdbp3qr.jpg

Essentially, as an experiment, our physics class whirled a stopper attached to a string that went through a tube that was finally attached to a weight on the bottom of the string.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not really sure, unless the centripetal force is somehow not adequate to hold the weight up, but it should be, as long as the stopper is swung around quickly enough.. This seems contradictory to everything that we've learned about UCM this semester.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to show that a horizontal circle as show in the diagram is not physically possible?
 
Oh yeah! Because if it was horizontal, there would be no "vertical tension" holding up the mass of the stopper?
 
BlueEight said:
Oh yeah! Because if it was horizontal, there would be no "vertical tension" holding up the mass of the stopper?
yes

Tsinθ=mg, θ=0, the mass will not stay in a horizontal circle.
 
Ah, thanks. But why would it be "necessary for experimental precision?"
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Acceleration in uniform circular motion is uniform or non-uniform?
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
Is the Instantaneous Circle Proven When Centripetal Force is Removed?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Tension of string acting on stone moving in horizontal circular motion
Replies
19
Views
3K
A Car on a Banked Curve Moving in Uniform Circular Motion
Replies
7
Views
3K
Circular Motion and centripetal acceleration
Replies
6
Views
3K
Is Vertical Circular Motion Ever Uniform?
Replies
10
Views
3K
What actually is the centripetal acceleration formula?
Replies
28
Views
3K
How does radius affect frequency in uniform circular motion?
Replies
17
Views
9K
Circular motion — the acceleration is not constant?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Acceleration in non-uniform circular motion
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top