Uniform Continuity of Sequences in Metric Space

jdcasey9
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that f:(M,d) -> (N,p) is uniformly continuous if and only if p(f(xn), f(yn)) -> 0 for any pair of sequences (xn) and (yn) in M satisfying d(xn, yn) -> 0.



Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution


First, let f:(M,d)->(N,p) be uniformly continuous.

Let \epsilon=2\delta.

lf(xn)-f(yn)l \leq lf(xn)-xnl + lxn-f(yn)l \leq lf(xn)-xnl + lxn-ynl + lyn-f(yn)l < \delta + 0 + \delta= 2\delta =\epsilon
(because f is uniformly continuous)

Therefore, p(f(xn), f(yn))->0.

Second, let p(f(xn), f(yn)) -> 0 for (xn), (yn) in M such that d(xn, yn) ->0.

We can do this nearly the same way, except at the end we say:

lf(xn)-f(yn)l \leq lf(xn)-xnl + lxn-ynl + lyn-f(yn)l -> 0 so it must be uniformly continuous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jdcasey9 said:
lf(xn)-f(yn)l \leq lf(xn)-xnl + lxn-f(yn)l \leq lf(xn)-xnl + lxn-ynl + lyn-f(yn)l < \delta + 0 + \delta= 2\delta =\epsilon

Firstly, how did you define the absolute value? Absolute value is only defined on R, but now you're working in an arbitrary metric space.
Secondly, how did you define f(x)-f(y). Again, you're working in an arbitrary metric space, thus it may be that there is no addition/substraction defined on that space.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top