Unique λ at which X-ray and electron have same energy

catkin
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Derive an equation to show that there is a unique wavelength at which X-ray photons and electrons have the same energy. Calculate this wavelength and energy.

Homework Equations


Here's what I thought was relevant. There may be others!

For photons: E = hf = h c / λ

For electrons:
λ = h / p (de Broglie)
K.E. = ½ mv^2
p = mv

The Attempt at a Solution


p = √(2mE)
Substituting in de Broglie
λ = h / √(2mE)
E = h^2 / 2mλ^2

Equating energies
(h c / λ)X-ray = (h^2 / 2mλ^2)electron
Gathering the constants (c, h, 2 and m -- the rest mass of an electron)
(λ)X-ray = (h / 2cm) * (λ^2)electron

... which does not have a unique solution :-(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't (λ)X-ray = (λ)electron?
 
Thanks Borek :)

(nice hair!)

That's what the question asks the answerer to show so I hope it's true! I don't think I've shown that it is so.

Writing y for (λ)X-ray, x for (λ)electron and lumping the constants together as k my attempt shows, when the X-ray and electron energies are the same,
y = k x^2

Mmm ... the more I read the question the more ambiguous it becomes. Perhaps it would help if you could translate the question into unambiguous language.

Best

Charles
 
Why do you still use two variables for wavelength, when you should use one?
 
Thanks again, Borek.

I need to show that λ = fe(E) and λ = fp(E) intersect before that is legitimate (subscript e for electron, p for photon).

With that requirement now clear ...

For photons:
λ = hc / E
= (hc) * (1 / E)

For electrons:
λ = sqrt(h^2 / 2mE)
= sqrt(h^2 / 2m) * sqrt(1 / E)

Regardless of the constant values, these functions intersect once.

At the intersect the previous equation becomes (thanks!)
λ = (h / 2cm) * (λ^2)
= 2cm / h

and the rest is trivial.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top