Unit Conversions Grams to Watts

  • Thread starter Thread starter MD_Programmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grams Unit Watts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting grams to watts in the context of calculating power output from thrust and velocity. The formula used is Pout = Tc * v, where power is measured in watts, thrust in grams, and velocity in meters per second. Participants highlight the importance of correct unit conversions, particularly when transitioning from lb*ft/sec to watts, and emphasize the need for scientific notation due to the small magnitudes involved. There is a concern about the efficiency calculations being significantly low, suggesting potential errors in the conversion process. Overall, the thread underscores the critical nature of accurate unit conversions in power calculations.
MD_Programmer
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The power available (output) is measured by the velocity at which you are moving and the thrust
required to create that movement. NOTE: Conversions for proper units are provided below
equation.

Power Available: Pout = Tc * v

where: Pout = power available (watts)
Tc = Calibrated thrust (grams)
v = wind tunnel velocity (m/s)

In order to determine the efficiency, the units must cancel. To convert the units so that the output
power is in watts, use the following information:

can't get the power right help?

Homework Equations



1 gram = 0.002205 lbs.
1 m/s = 3.28 ft/s
1 horsepower = 550 lb*ft/sec
1 horsepower = 745.7 watts

v = 3 m/s
Tc = 0.0040 g

The Attempt at a Solution



(0.0040*0.002205) = 8.82 E-6

(3*3.28) = 9.84 ft/s

((8.82 E-6 * 9.84) *550) / 745.7 = 6.401212284 E-5 watts
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're right in everything except going from lb*ft/sec to watts. Check your unit conversions. I think you should divide by 550 and then multiply by 745.7.
 
I got 0.000 watts using that method but that doesn't sound right because my efficiency calculations after are barely 1% and this data should keep to where they don't get above 80% according to the professor
 
MD_Programmer said:
I got 0.000 watts using that method but that doesn't sound right because my efficiency calculations after are barely 1% and this data should keep to where they don't get above 80% according to the professor

These are extremely small magnitudes you are dealing with, so you should be using scientific notation in your calculations.

You haven't provided any efficiency calculations, so it is not clear what your problem is.

It's hard to envision what sort of mechanism you are dealing with (a gnat on afterburners, perhaps), but whatever it is, only microscopic amounts of power are being generated.
 
Back
Top