Universal Quantifier: Determining Truth Value in Existential Statements

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattmns
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the truth value of the statement ∃x ∈ ℝ ∀y, ∃z ∈ ℝ such that xz = y. Initially, it was thought to be false by considering x = 0 and y = 1, which leads to no valid z. However, it was clarified that the existential quantifier allows for the existence of at least one x that satisfies the condition for all y. By choosing x = 1, it was demonstrated that for any y, a corresponding z can be found, confirming the statement's truth. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of existential versus universal quantifiers in logical statements.
mattmns
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
5
I have a question that says, determine the truth value of: \exists x \ni \forall y, \exists z \ni xz = y

I am thinking this is false because: If you let x = 0, and let y = 1, then there is no value of z that will make the statement true. Am I thinking about this correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your reasoning would be right if that was a universal quantifier instead of an existential one. All you have to find is one x where this is true and the statement is true.
 
So if x=1 then for every value of y there is a value of z such that xz = y.

So it is dependent on the statements afterward, the exestential quantifier \exists x ? So I would say. There is a value of x such that for any value of y there is a value of z such that xz = y. I guess you are right, it sounds as though it depends on the things that follow. Thanks.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top