Use Coulomb's Law to calculate the number of excess electrons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using Coulomb's Law to determine the number of excess electrons on a second negatively charged object, given a repulsive force of 6.3 N at a distance of 0.5 cm. The first object has 8.3 x 10^22 excess electrons, equating to a charge of approximately 1.3 x 10^4 coulombs. By rearranging Coulomb's Law, the charge on the second object was calculated to be around 1.3 x 10^-18 coulombs, which corresponds to approximately 8.1 excess electrons. Participants emphasized the importance of maintaining significant digits throughout calculations for accuracy. The consensus is to carry three digits in intermediate steps to ensure the final answer is precise.
dwach
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two negatively charged objects repel each other with a measured force of 6.3 N when they are 0.5 cm apart. If the excess charge on one of the objects is caused by 8.3 x 10^22 extra electrons, use Coulomb's Law to calculate the number of excess electrons on the second object.

Homework Equations



F = k*(q1)*(q2) / r^2

1e = 1.602 * 10^-19 c
1c = 6.242 * 10^18 e
k = 9.0 * 10^9 N*m^2/c^2

The Attempt at a Solution

I calculated the excess charge to be:

(8.3*10^22 e) * (1.602 *10^-19) = 1.3 * 10^4 c

I used this as q2 in the F = k*(q1)*(q2) / r^2 equation and rearranged to find that:

q1 = (F * r^2) / k*q2
q1 = (6.3N * 0.005m^2) / (9.0*10^9N*m^2/c^2)*(1.3*10^4c)
q1 = 1.3 * 10^-18

Since 1c = 6.242*10^18e, to find number of excess electrons i multiplied q1 by 6.242*10^18 = 8.1146 eSo is the number of excess electrons on the second object 8.1 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, dwach!
Your calc looks good, and thank you for taking time to write out the method so clearly. I don't know what accuracy you need; I'm used to 3 digits so I keep 4 in intermediate steps and I got 1.318 x 10^-18 for the charge, which is 8.24 electrons.
 
Thank you for the quick response Delphi51. In this question I need 2 digit accuracy so would you suggest that I carry 3 digits through the intermediate steps?
 
Last edited:
Yes, you must carry 3 digits to get 2 at the end. In practise, you probably will just keep all the digits your calculator produces for the first calc and only round when you write down the final answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top