Use superposition to find potential drop (but a problem)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using superposition to find the voltage V0 in a circuit with both voltage and current sources. The user calculates the currents I' and I'' for the voltage source shorted and the current source cut out, arriving at both being 2A. However, confusion arises regarding the direction of the currents, leading to the conclusion that the total current is zero, which is deemed acceptable. Further suggestions include confirming results through nodal or mesh analysis, and the user finds that switching to a Norton equivalent confirms the cancellation of currents. Ultimately, the analysis leads to the conclusion that V0 is also zero.
Color_of_Cyan
Messages
386
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use superposition to find V0 in the circuit:


http://imageshack.us/a/img62/5567/eecircfinal1.jpg


Homework Equations




V = IR

Voltage division for 2 series resistors:
V across a resistor = (Resistor / total series resistance)(V in)

Current division for 2 parallel resistors:
Current through a resistor = (other resistor / math. sum of parallel resistors)(I in)


Superposition methods:
I = I' + I''

I' = current with circuit having voltage source shorted
I'' = current with circuit having current source cut out

The Attempt at a Solution




Following the above & So for I' and the voltage source shorted:

http://imageshack.us/a/img29/8991/eecircfinal1edit1.jpg


Then with current division,

I' = (4Ω/12Ω)(6A)

I' = 2A


Following the above again for I'' and with the current source cut out:

http://imageshack.us/a/img541/5840/eecircfinal1edit2.jpg


And then since the resistors above are all in series then I just add to get R tot = 12Ω.

But then I = V/R

So then I'' = 24V / 12Ω

I'' = 2A,

BUT compared with the set superposition current direction in the diagram would it then be -2A?


If so, then the current I = I' + I'' would be 0 and then I think that would be wrong. I know afterwards after you get I from I' + I'', then V0 is just V0 = I*2Ω
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Color_of_Cyan said:
BUT compared with the set superposition current direction in the diagram would it then be -2A?
Sure.
If so, then the current I = I' + I'' would be 0 and then I think that would be wrong. I know afterwards after you get I from I' + I'', then V0 is just V0 = I*2Ω
0 is a perfectly good value for the current :smile:

Why not confirm your results using one or more other techniques? For example, nodal analysis, or mesh analysis. Or even better, source conversion; convert the voltage source and series resistor into an equivalent current source... what do you see then?
 
Okay, so it's a trick question then :D

Thanks.

So V0 is just 0 then too.

And checking what you say, switched the Thevenin voltage to Norton equivalent current (or however you call it) and got 6A going the opposite way. So the current actually cancels out ?
Thanks for the help again.
 
Color_of_Cyan said:
And checking what you say, switched the Thevenin voltage to Norton equivalent current (or however you call it) and got 6A going the opposite way. So the current actually cancels out ?
The current sources are in parallel, so they add: -6 + 6 = 0, no problem!
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top