Use superposition to solve for vs in the circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using superposition to solve for voltage (vx) in a circuit. The initial attempt yielded an incorrect result of 5.33V, while the solution manual indicated -26.67V. A key point raised is the importance of maintaining a consistent reference point (ground) when calculating voltages v1 and v2. The participant realized that moving the reference point affected the relationship between v2 and vx, leading to confusion in their calculations. Ultimately, the correct approach involves keeping the ground consistent throughout the analysis to accurately determine vx.
sugz
Messages
110
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use superposition to solve for vx in the circuit of attached document titled "Problem".

Homework Equations



Vx=V1+V2, where V1 is the voltage obtained using superposition by removing 6A source and V2 is the voltage obtained using superposition by removing 4A source.

The Attempt at a Solution



Solutions for the problem by me is shown in attached document titled "hand_solutions".

It seems as though my answer is incorrect as I obtained 5.33V whereas the solution manual (also attached as titled "solution_manual") shows the answer as -26.67. Can anyone tell me where I went wrong? It seems as though my steps are correct.
 

Attachments

  • hand_solution.jpg
    hand_solution.jpg
    27.6 KB · Views: 1,004
  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    39.2 KB · Views: 1,051
  • solution_manual.PNG
    solution_manual.PNG
    67.8 KB · Views: 1,044
Physics news on Phys.org
You moved the reference point (ground) between your solution for v1 and v2. v2 is not the same as vx for that case.
 
  • Like
Likes sugz
Hi gneill, thank you very much for your reply!
Does the reference point (ground) have to be kept consistent through v1 and v2? I made the assumption I could place them wherever since they v1 and v2 circuits were variations of the first circuit. I think I understand it now as I should choose my ground on the initial circuit given in the problem and then use superposition and remove the independent sources and keep the ground consistent. Is this right?
 
sugz said:
Hi gneill, thank you very much for your reply!
Does the reference point (ground) have to be kept consistent through v1 and v2? I made the assumption I could place them wherever since they v1 and v2 circuits were variations of the first circuit. I think I understand it now as I should choose my ground on the initial circuit given in the problem and then use superposition and remove the independent sources and keep the ground consistent. Is this right?
You can move your reference point or even change analysis methods altogether as long as you actually determine the right quantity :smile: When you moved the reference point in your second part you placed the controlled voltage source between the 8 Ohm resistor and that reference . So it's now in the path from v2 through the 8 Ohm resistor to the reference. You'd have to take that into account to determine vx.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top