Use the variation method with trial Wavefunction (Szabo and Oslund ex 1.18)

Is this question useful?

  • very much so

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • somewhat so

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • a little

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • not relevant

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
gradstudentNZ
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Schrodinger equation (in atomic units) of an electron moving in one dimension under the influence of the potential -delta(x) [dirac delta function] is:

(-1/2.d2/dx2-delta(x)).psi=E.psi

use the variation method with the trial function psi'=Ne-a.x2 to show that -pi-1 is an upper bound to the exact ground state energy (which is -0.5). You will need the integral:

int(-inf..inf)dx. x2me-a.x2=(2m)!pi1/2/22mm!.am+1/2



Homework Equations



a) 1D Shrodinger eq: (-1/2.d2/dx2-delta(x)).phi=E.psi
b) trial wave function: psi'=Ne-a.x2
c) Useful integral: int(-inf..inf)dx. x2me-a.x2=(2m)!pi1/2/22mm!.am+1/2

d) variation method: E0<= <psi'|H|psi'>/|<psi'|psi'>|2



The Attempt at a Solution



You basically need to plug in the wave function psi' (equation b) into the variation method (equation d) using the hamiltonian in equation a). I do this but do not arrive at -1/pi. Instead I get the answer: a-(2a)1/2/pi1/2

Can anyone find the error in my logic/arithmetic below?


First determine the normalization constant N in psi' by computing: <psi'|psi'> = 1 and solving for N.

This gives: N2int(-inf..inf)dxe-2ax2 using equation c) for this integral with m = 0 I obtain:

N2pi1/2/(2a)1/2=1
therefore N2=(2a)1/2/pi1/2


The hamiltonian has two terms the kinetic energy (Ke) and the potential energy (V) term.

<psi'|H|psi'> = <psi'|Ke|psi'> + <psi'|V|psi'>

where Ke = -1/2d2/dx2
and V = -delta(x)

First compute the Ke term in the integral <psi'|H|psi'>


Ke integral = <psi'|-1/2d2/dx2|psi'>

The first derivative of psi' is:
d/dx psi' = N(-2ax.e-ax2)

Therefore the second derivative is:
d2/dx2 psi' = N( (2ax)2 -2a) e-ax2

using this the Ke integral becomes:

=-1/2 N2int(-inf..inf).dx ( (2ax)2 -2a) e-2ax2

the first term in the brackets corresponds to m = 1 in the useful integral (equation c) and the second term in the brackets corresponds to m = 0 in the useful integral (equation c)

So the Ke integral becomes (after cancelling terms and rearranging):

<psi'|Ke|psi'> = (1/2)N2((2a)1/2pi1/2)


The potential energy integral is the following:

<psi'|V|psi'> = <psi'|-delta(x)|psi'>

= -N2 ea.0

=-N2


so the whole term < psi'|H|psi'> is:


(1/2)N2((2a)1/2pi1/2) -N2

now all that remains is to plug in N2 which we computed at the beginning:

this reduces the above to:

a-(2a)1/2/pi1/2

this is not -1/pi given in the question... so can anyone tell me what algebra/logic error have I committed?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to check your calculation for the kinetic energy. I found
\left\langle \psi&#039; \left\lvert -\frac{1}{2}\frac{d^2}{dx^2} \right\rvert \psi&#039; \right\rangle = \frac{1}{2}N^2\sqrt{\frac{a\pi}{2}}
You're going to end up with an upper bound for the energy that depends on a. What you want to do is then find the value of a that minimizes the upper bound. At that value of a, the upper bound is -1/\pi.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top