B Vacuum in tanks similiar torricellian vacuum

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter mcmpw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vacuum
AI Thread Summary
Perpetual motion is not possible, and discussions about it are prohibited on the forum. The water levels in a tank will equalize at approximately 10 meters above the spillway, due to atmospheric pressure and the principles of a water-filled barometer. The thread was closed to adhere to forum rules against discussing perpetual motion machines (PMMs). Resources were provided to further explain the reasoning behind this policy. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between legitimate scientific inquiry and pseudoscience.
mcmpw
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
onsidering fluid dynamics and conversion of mass.......after all tanks and lines filled with water, then opening sluice valve to "tank a", afterwards others, water perpetual flow or no?🤔

and if not, where will water levels equalize?
asd.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

mcmpw said:
... water perpetual flow or no?
No. Perpetual motion is not possible.
Discussion of PM is forbidden on this site.

mcmpw said:
... and if not, where will water levels equalize?
About 10 metres above the spillway of the catch tank. That is the height of a water-filled barometer, a column of water supported by atmospheric pressure with a near vacuum of water vapour above.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
@mcmpw -- Welcome to PF. We do not allow discussion of PMMs here at PF, so your thread is now closed.

Please see these resources to help you understand why we do not waste time discussing PMMs:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-we-dont-discuss-perpetual-motion-machines-pmm.983769/

PF Forbidden Topics said:
Pseudoscience, such as (but not limited to):
Perpetual motion and "free energy" discussions (see our Insights Article here)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
http://www.skepdic.com/freeenergy.html
http://www.skepdic.com/perpetual.html
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Similar threads

I Vacuum pump operating at high altitude
Replies
18
Views
3K
B Vacuum Audio Failure: Solutions & Tips
Replies
26
Views
2K
Free Falling powder in a vacuum
Replies
7
Views
4K
Optimal Size of Rocket Engine Nozzle for Vacuum Performance
Replies
26
Views
3K
Rotation within a vacuum vs rotation with a pressurized environment.
Replies
4
Views
987
Working in a Vacuum & zero gravity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Acceleration of a gas into a vacuum
Replies
4
Views
1K
Influence of vacuum in the Conservation of energy
Replies
39
Views
3K
Vacuum cleaner in a weightless environment
Replies
6
Views
2K
Newtonian vacuum: what to call it in thought experiment
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top