Valence Bond question (Chemistry)

  • Thread starter Thread starter el_hijoeputa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bond Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the BH3 molecule and its hybridization, specifically the formation of sp2 orbitals from boron's electron configuration. The query addresses the fate of the third 2p orbital after forming three bonding orbitals, with a focus on whether it should be classified as nonbonding in an energy level diagram. It is clarified that while the remaining 2p orbital does not participate in bonding under normal circumstances, it should still be included in the valence bond energy level diagram for completeness. Additionally, if the molecule ionizes, any gained electrons would occupy this nonbonding orbital. The importance of accurately representing all orbitals in such diagrams is emphasized.
el_hijoeputa
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm working a problem with the BH3 molecule. Therefore boron is 1s^2 2s^2 2p^1, and using the hypotetical method, it forms hybird sp2 orbitals. Promoting an electron to get 1s^2 2s^1 2p^2.

My question is that, it will form 3 bonding orbitals, one from the 1s and 2 from the 2p orbitals... what happends to the third 2p orbital? If I do an energy level diagram, do I have to list this orbital as a nonbonding one?

I posted this on the chemistry forum, but decided to post it here because there are more people visiting this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if you'd particularly list it as nonbinding or not, but yes, all the bonding when you have single bonds is done by hybrid orbitals (sp2); the leftover 2p orbital only has something to do if you have a double bond in the molecule. As it is, it'd just stick out perpendicular to the plane of the three sp2 orbitals.
 
So, should I listed in the VB energy level diagram for the BH3 molecule? In case it ionizes, gaining electrons... would they go to this nonbonding orbital?
 
If by the valence bond energy diagram you mean this kind of thing

_ _ _ _
_ _
_

and so forth, then yes, you should list the remaining 2p (it's going to be slightly higher than sp since sp is a combination of s and p, after all) in the diagram - not because it plays or doesn't play a role in bonding necessarily, though, but just because these diagrams show all the orbitals you have. check and add up your electrons to figure out if the orbital is filled or not, though.
 
Thanks Duarh, thank you very much for your help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top