Van de Waals fluid in Free energy, Enthelpy representations

Kidphysics
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
Compute the coefficient of expansion α in terms of P and V...

Homework Statement



Compute the coefficient of expansion α in terms of P and V for an ideal Van der Waals
gas

Homework Equations



(p+a/v^2)(v-b)=RT

The Attempt at a Solution



Is this as simple as solving for a? How would I go about eliminating T? I believe I have to take a derivative.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Kidphysics said:

Homework Statement



Compute the coefficient of expansion α in terms of P and V for an ideal Van der Waals
gas

Homework Equations



(p+a/v^2)(v-b)=RT

The Attempt at a Solution



Is this as simple as solving for a? How would I go about eliminating T? I believe I have to take a derivative.

The coefficient of thermal expansion is defined as:

\alpha=\frac{1}{v}(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T})_p
 
Last edited:


Chestermiller said:
The coefficient of thermal expansion is defined as:

\alpha=\frac{1}{v}(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T})_p

ah yes, I should have looked that up myself I assumed it was the a in the formula. Since it seems I cannot isolate v in this equation I cannot explicitly find (\frac{\partial v}{\partial T})_p I tried looking for some nifty maxwell's relations but I cannot find any that would be useful.. any helpful hints? and thank you for the reply!
 
Who says you have to do it explicitly?
 
Chestermiller said:
Who says you have to do it explicitly?

Ok bare with me I'm not the brightest. So are you implying I should compute

∂/∂T(pv-pb+a/v-ba/v^2=RT)

and get something like p∂v/∂T-a/v^2(∂v/∂T)+ba/v^3(∂v/∂T)=R∂T/∂T

Then factor and get ∂v/∂T= R/(p-a/v^2+ba/v^3)

then


α=(1/v)(∂v∂T)p = (1/v)R/(p-a/v^2+ba/v^3)

it's in terms of p,v at least.. is this correct?
 
Looks OK, except for the omission of a factor of 2 in the ba term. If I were you, I would try playing with the final equation a little bit to see if I could combine it with the original equation in some way to manipulate it into a simpler form. If you don't feel like doing this, that's OK. Your answer is fine as it is. Nice job.
 
Chestermiller said:
Looks OK, except for the omission of a factor of 2 in the ba term. If I were you, I would try playing with the final equation a little bit to see if I could combine it with the original equation in some way to manipulate it into a simpler form. If you don't feel like doing this, that's OK. Your answer is fine as it is. Nice job.

Pretty awesome stuff Chestermiller I appreciate it.
 
Back
Top