Vector Operations in Polar Coordinates?

Poweranimals
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Do you think you could do vector operations in polar coordinates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you're in \mathbb{R}^3 and you want to designate the tip of a vector by giving three coordinates, then you can use spherical coordinates (or polar coordinates in \mathbb{R}^2) or any other coordinate system.

But using rectangular coordinates is much more convenient, because the vector notation in component form will mean the first component times the first basis-vector, the second component times the second basis-vector and so on. This can't be done in polar/spherical coordinates.
Also, adding vectors component-wise, and things like the dot-product are of no use either.

So much of the reason why you use vectors will be lost when going to spherical/polar coordinates.

In short, with vectors: use a linear coordinate system.
 
Depends what you're doing. In physics, it is often convenient to use spherical polar coordinates for vector fields, particular if the field is spherically symmetrical. If you have cylindrical symmetry, cylindrical polar coordinates are often useful.

You can certainly write grad f, div V, and curl V in terms of their polar components.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top