Vectors & Angles: Find Relationship between \alpha & \beta

  • Thread starter Thread starter Apteronotus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Vectors
Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Suppose you have three vectors a, b and c.
Say the angle between a and c is given by \alpha, and between b and c by \beta.

Can we find a relationship between \alpha and \beta?

Thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if you know dot products then you know:

a . c = ||a|| ||c|| cos(\alpha)
b . c = ||b|| ||c|| cos(\beta)

So you could rearrange that to find a relationship between \alpha and \beta.
 
Thank you Whybother,

Of course you are correct. But I'm wondering can a relation be found that does not involve the dot product? Perhaps if we think of the three vectors as the edge of a parallelepiped?
 
Apteronotus said:
Thank you Whybother,

Of course you are correct. But I'm wondering can a relation be found that does not involve the dot product? Perhaps if we think of the three vectors as the edge of a parallelepiped?

Even if you are defining a parallelepiped in 3space, I don't think you can escape from the notion of dot and cross products. Looking at a http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/Parallelepiped_volume.svg/780px-Parallelepiped_volume.svg.png" of it, it seems unavoidable to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top