Vectors with different coordinate systems

Hoeni
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am trying to simulate a freely jointed chain polymer to do that I want to put several rods (length a) on top of each other but with different angles. My problem is like this
I have a vector(1) and at the end of this vector(1) I put another vector(2), the z-axis of this vector(2)'s coordinate system is the direction of vector(1), but how do express the coordinates of the tip of this vector(2) in the coordinate system of vector(1)
t=theta f= phi a= radius
V1:
x = a sin t cos f
y = a sin t sin f
z = a cos t

and in another coordinate system
V2:
x2 = a sin t2 cos f2
y2 = a sin t2 sin f2
z2 = a cos t2

The direction of V1 is the z-axis in the coordinate system of V2
Given the fact that all the angles are known, how do I express the location of V2 in the coordinate system of V1?
Probably something with Euler transformations but i haven''t been able to figure it out.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Hoeni
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You say "another coordinate system" but how are the two coordinate system related? You will need to know that before you can say anything about how descriptions of vectors in the two coordinate systems are related.
 
As I said: "The direction of V1 is the z-axis in the coordinate system of V2"
This was kind of the whole point of the question considering what I said about the freely jointed chain.

But I think I might have solved it, I used x2,y2,z2 ( derived from t2, a, and f2) and with some geometry I projected all these components on the three axes in the coordinate system of v1. My result:
x = x2 cos f + y2 cos t cos f + z2 sin t cos f
y = x2 sin f + y2 cos t sin f + z2 sin t cos f
z = 0 + y2 sin t + z2 cos t

But I need to check if I did al the calculations right.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top