Velocity distribution of atoms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of gas atoms in a 3D box and their velocity distribution as described by the Maxwell distribution. When a hole is made in the box, the question arises whether the velocity components remain governed by the Maxwell distribution. It is suggested that the distribution still applies, but confusion exists regarding the representation of negative velocities in the context of the coordinate system. The challenge lies in understanding how to account for negative velocities when plotting the distribution. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying the Maxwell distribution to a scenario where atoms can escape from confinement.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

If I have a gas of atoms confined to a (3D) box, then the probability of an atom having a speed (vx, vy, vz) is given by the Maxwell distribution. Say I now make a hole in the box, such that the atoms can "fly" out of it (see attached picture). Would I still be able to describe the components by a Maxwell distribution?


Niles.
 

Attachments

  • gas.PNG
    gas.PNG
    618 bytes · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that it is still given by a Maxwell distribution, but something about this I can't quite understand: When I plot the distribution, the probability of having a negative velocity is zero. So after choosing a coordinate system, how would I ever be able to get a negative velocity?Niles.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top