Velocity of center of mass of spinning disk

AI Thread Summary
A solid uniform disk with a mass of 19.0 kg and a radius of 0.7 m is subjected to a constant force of 35.0 N via a string wrapped around its rim on a frictionless surface. The initial calculations mistakenly applied the wrong acceleration, leading to an incorrect speed of the center of mass after moving 6 m. The correct application of Newton's second law reveals that the acceleration is 1.667 m/s², resulting in a final speed of 5.1 m/s after the disk travels the specified distance. The discussion emphasizes the importance of separating linear and angular motions when analyzing forces and torques. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the velocity of the center of mass in such scenarios.
atlarge
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A solid uniform disk of mass 19.0 kg and radius 70.0 cm (.7 m) is at rest FLAT on a frictionless surface. A string is wrapped around the rim of the disk and a constant force of 35.0 N is applied to the string. The string does not slip on the rim. The string is being pulled. When the disk has moved a distance of 6 m, what is the speed of the center of mass?



Relevant equations (I think...):
I=1/2MR^2
FR=Iα
α=a/R


So far, I have:
FR=Iα
FR=1/2MR^2(a/R)
F=1/2Ma
a=2*F/M=3.33333 m/s^2

and then,
v^2=2*a*6m, since initial velocity is 0.
v=7.26 m/s

But this is wrong, and I'm not sure why. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton's second law holds for translational motion, even if the net force results in a torque. The angular and linear components can be dealt with separately when they are not "coupled" via some friction or other mechanical mechanism (like a rolling object or a pulley and string).
 
Thank you. I'm not sure how I would use Newton's Second Law, due to the fact that the normal force and mg are perpendicular to the movement and therefore not contributing to the velocity.

I'm so frustrated :)
 
atlarge said:
Thank you. I'm not sure how I would use Newton's Second Law, due to the fact that the normal force and mg are perpendicular to the movement and therefore not contributing to the velocity.

I'm so frustrated :)

mg and the normal force are equal and opposite, so their contribution vanishes. You only have to deal with the force applied via the string.
 
OH, thank you gneill!

Answer is:

F=ma
35N=(21kg)a
a=1.667 m/s^2

v^2=0 + 2(1.667)(7.9), 0 being the initial velocity
v=5.1 m/s
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top