Velocity of two insulating charged spheres at collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the velocities of two insulating charged spheres just before they collide, given their masses, radii, and charges. Participants emphasize using conservation of energy and momentum principles to solve the problem, noting the importance of understanding the initial potential energy and final kinetic energy. There is a suggestion that the question focuses on the velocities right before collision rather than after. The ambiguity in the problem's wording is acknowledged, indicating that additional context could clarify the solution approach. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for a clear setup of energy equations to find the velocities.
intemk9
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Two insulating spheres have radii 0.300 cm and 0.500 cm, masses 0.200 kg and 0.700 kg, and uniformly distributed charges of -2.00 µC and 3.00 µC. They are released from rest when their centers are separated by 1.00 m.
(a) How fast will each be moving when they collide?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know i need to use the conservation of energy for the potential and kinetic forces, but I cannot figure out how to appropriately set up the equation in order to do so.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi intemk9! welcome to pf! :smile:

don't forget you can also use conservation of momentum :wink:
 
Can you argue through the conservation of energy and momentum in words? What sort of energy does each sphere start out with, and what kind does it have at the end of the motion? Do you know the equations for kinetic and potential energy?
 
I think that the question is about velocity just before collision and not after collision.
The wording is a little ambiguous. If the rest of the problem were given, I suppose it will become more clear.
For part (a) conservation of energy may be enough.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top