Verify "Explicitly" 9.3: Zwiebach Page 159

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Quick Calculation 9.3 asks us to verify "explicitly" that x^\mu(tau, sigma) is real. But can't you just look at 9.49 where this is quite manifest? What do they mean "explicitly"?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Explicitly doesn't mean much here. he simply means show that
(X^{\mu}(\tau,\sigma))^{*} = X^{\mu}(\tau,\sigma).
But then how else would you do it? As for using (9.49), the business end of the work is in showing that the expression inside the parentheses is imaginary. Since the same expression appears in (9.52) it hardly matters which one you use. However, if you use (9.49), you are not finished since all you will have proved is that the l.h.s. of that equation is real, not what was asked in the QC. But if you use (9.52) you are finished.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top