What is the maximum distance a block will fall on a vertically hanging spring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shawli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring Vertical
AI Thread Summary
A vertically hanging spring with a spring constant of 450 N/m is analyzed with a 2.2 kg block attached, which falls until it reaches maximum displacement. The discussion clarifies that at the equilibrium position, only gravitational potential energy is present, while at maximum displacement, only elastic potential energy is present. The relevant formula derived is h = mg/k, which relates the mass, gravitational force, and spring constant to determine maximum displacement. The calculations confirm that the maximum distance the block falls is approximately 0.095 meters. The reasoning presented is validated as correct, aiding in understanding the energy dynamics of the system.
shawli
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spring with a spring constant of 450 N/m hangs vertically. You attach a 2.2 kg block to it and allow the mass to fall. What is the maximum distance the block will fall before it begins moving upward?


Homework Equations



I'm not exactly sure how the conservation of energy equation would look for this. So, when the mass pulls the spring down to its maximum displacement, there is only elastic potential energy in the isolated spring system. Now I'm not sure what other point to use this information in reference to.

If it's the equilibrium position that I'm also supposed to look at, then I'm not sure what forms of energy are present at that point.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait nevermind ... I googled it. The equilibrium position no longer equals x = 0 for a vertical spring, and the formula becomes h = mg/k.
Whoops lol.
 
shawli said:
Wait nevermind ... I googled it. The equilibrium position no longer equals x = 0 for a vertical spring, and the formula becomes h = mg/k.
Whoops lol.

Does the problem make sense though?
 
Erm, from what I understand... A mass of 2.2kg is attached to a spring while it is at the equilibrium position. Gravity makes the spring stretch downwards until it reaches a maximum point where there is only elastic potential energy, and then it starts to move back up again.

I'm still a bit confused about what energy is acting where in terms of the "isolated system".

And this formula, h = mg/k, actually isn't giving me the correct answer. ...So I guess it doesn't make sense lol. :/
 
Okay I think I got it!

At the equilibrium position, only gravitational potential energy is present since the mass-spring system has not moved yet at that instant and since the spring is vertical.

The mass pulls the spring down to its maximum displacement, and at that point only elastic potential energy is present.

So:

Eg = Ee
m * g * h = 0.5 * k * x^2

At the equilibrium position, the height of the mass should be equal to the maximum displacement after the mass falls. So, x = h:

m * g * x = 0.5 * k * x^2
0 = 0.5*450*x^2 - 2.2*9.8*x
x= 0 and 0.095m

Woot right answer :). Is my reasoning all correct?
 
Maybe this will help with the concepts.

spring.JPG



Woot? Am I helping an Aggie?

\m/ that's a hookem horns sign... :)

Your reasoning using energy looks correct without doing the math myself.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top