How Fast Will the Bowling Ball Swing at a 10-Degree Angle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter monky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a bowling ball swinging at a 10-degree angle after being released from a 20-degree angle. Participants emphasize the importance of using conservation of energy principles, where the potential energy lost equals the kinetic energy gained. The drop in height can be calculated using the rope length and the cosine of the angles. One contributor reassures that mass can be treated as a variable, allowing for the cancellation in equations, simplifying the problem. The conversation highlights a common challenge in applying theoretical concepts to practical problems in physics.
monky
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A bowling ball hangs from a rope with length L of 5.00 meters.
Initially, the bowling ball is at a position such that the rope makes a 20 degree angle with respect to vertical. The ball is released from rest.


What is the speed of the bowling ball when it swings down and the rope makes an angle of 10 degrees?




Just looking for help on setting the problem up.

I have done every other problem on my homework so far with relative ease. I'm sure I've learned what I need to know to do this problem, but it's just not happening :frown:
Whoever can point me in the right direction, the chapters are all focused on Newton's 2nd law, and thus any responses should be pretty basic :smile:It's just a physics I class, but my book has no pendelum problems in it for examples thus far.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you covered potential energy yet? Two concepts that will make this problem easy are potential energy and conservation of energy. Finding the answer using only Newton's 2nd law is way too much trouble (requires calculus).

The idea is, the total energy of the bowling ball (kinetic energy plus potential energy) is the same at all times throughout the ball's motion. At first, all its energy is potential--it is at rest. The ball loses potential energy on the way down. That loss is exactly balanced by a gain in kinetic energy. Kinetic energy is what you are looking for.
 
PBRMEASAP said:
Have you covered potential energy yet? Two concepts that will make this problem easy are potential energy and conservation of energy. Finding the answer using only Newton's 2nd law is way too much trouble (requires calculus).

The idea is, the total energy of the bowling ball (kinetic energy plus potential energy) is the same at all times throughout the ball's motion. At first, all its energy is potential--it is at rest. The ball loses potential energy on the way down. That loss is exactly balanced by a gain in kinetic energy. Kinetic energy is what you are looking for.

Yes we have, and I understand that the energy shifts from potential to kinetic (and back on the up swing). But, everything we've done so far involves the mass of the object. Without the mass, I'm sort of loss. I'm sure somewhere there's a conversion from energy to the variables I am given in this problem, but I'm not finding it.

A little more push in the right direction :redface:

I realize that the height is L-Lcos20 initially and L-Lcos10 final . So I know the amount of drop in height. However, all of my books problems involve a mass (which then I could do this), but I don't know where to go right now.
 
monky said:
Yes we have, and I understand that the energy shifts from potential to kinetic (and back on the up swing). But, everything we've done so far involves the mass of the object. Without the mass, I'm sort of loss. I'm sure somewhere there's a conversion from energy to the variables I am given in this problem, but I'm not finding it.

A little more push in the right direction :redface:

I realize that the height is L-Lcos20 initially and L-Lcos10 final . So I know the amount of drop in height. However, all of my books problems involve a mass (which then I could do this), but I don't know where to go right now.
Dont worry about mass - put "m" in for mass, and you'll find that in equating GPE and KE the masses will cancel each other! Numbers are not neccesary to do physics - you can find a general case for many things by plugging in a variable and solving anyway.
 
oh crap, well that was extremely simple! Sometimes I just look for too much.

Thank you :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top