Virtual work = 0 implies net torque = 0

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2018-3-24_14-16-33.png


Homework Equations


upload_2018-3-24_14-17-10.png
upload_2018-3-24_14-17-29.png

## \vec \tau = \Sigma \vec r_i \times \vec F_i ##

The Attempt at a Solution


## \vec \tau = \Sigma \vec r_i \times \vec F_i ##

## \delta W = \Sigma F_i \delta x_i ##

Let's take our Cartesian coordinate system such that the axis of rotation becomes its z-axis.

Let's say that the body rotates through an angle ##\theta## so that the displacement ## \vec dx_i = \vec \theta \times \vec r_i ##.

Now, how to calculate virtual displacement?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-3-24_14-16-33.png
    upload_2018-3-24_14-16-33.png
    9.9 KB · Views: 834
  • upload_2018-3-24_14-17-10.png
    upload_2018-3-24_14-17-10.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 834
  • upload_2018-3-24_14-17-29.png
    upload_2018-3-24_14-17-29.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 837
Physics news on Phys.org
This is one that is outside of my area of expertise, but I think you can use a generalized type of coordinate and then write it as ## dW=\tau \, d \theta ## where ## \tau ## is a torque. In more detail, as vectors, it may read ## dW=\vec{\tau} \cdot d \vec{\theta} ## , where ## \vec{\theta }## is along the axis of rotation.
 
Pushoam said:
Let's say that the body rotates through an angle ##\theta## so that the displacement ## \vec dx_i = \vec \theta \times \vec r_i ##.
Now, how to calculate virtual displacement?
Your equation ## \vec dx_i = \vec \theta \times \vec r_i ## is essentially what you need. Imagine the particles of the body undergo virtual displacements corresponding to a virtual rotation ##\delta \theta \, \hat \theta## of the body. What is the corresponding virtual displacement ##\vec {\delta r_i}## of the ##i##th particle?

Note that the virtual work can be written as ##\delta W = \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^N \vec {F_i} \cdot \vec {\delta r_i} ##
 
In writing dxi = theta x ri you are equating a differential quantity with a finite quantity. This cannot be correct.

Instead, write dx = d(theta) x ri, where ri is constant for for each particle.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
It is perhaps worth mentioning that the sum of the forces on a body or system can add to zero, and there can still be a net torque on the system. (For example, two forces of equal magnitude in opposite directions can both be applying a torque in the same direction). Thereby the system is then not at equilibrium, but can be undergoing a change in its angular momentum and rotational energy. The ## \delta W ## from any torques needs to be zero as well to have equilibrium.
 
Charles Link said:
It is perhaps worth mentioning that the sum of the forces on a body or system can add to zero, and there can still be a net torque on the system.

This is most certainly true.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top