Voltage across current-controlled-current-source

  • Thread starter Thread starter kexanie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voltage
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the Thevenin and Norton equivalent circuits for a given circuit with a dependent current source. The main challenge is determining the open-circuit voltage while considering the implications of leaving the terminals open, which leads to a contradiction regarding current flow. It is concluded that if the terminals are left open, the current Ix through the resistor is zero, making the voltage between terminals a and b equal to Vs. The dependent current source is effectively "deactivated" in this scenario, confirming that no current flows through the loop. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate circuit analysis.
kexanie
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Draw the Thevenin and Norton equivalent circuits for diagram 1, labeling the elements and terminals.
ZR = 5 Ω, ZL = j5Ω, Vs = 3∠30°, the current flowing throught the resistance is Ix, and the current flowing through the dependent current source is 0.5Ix.

Homework Equations



KVL and KCL in Steady-State Sinusoidal Analysis.
Ohm's law in Steady-State Sinusoidal Analysis.

The Attempt at a Solution



Because this circuit contains a dependent source, I cannot find the Thevenin resistance by zeroing the sources and combining the impedances in series. Thus, I try to find the open-circuit voltage.

But what I don't understand is, by using KVL, Vs = VL + VId + VR. How can I derived the voltage across the dependent current source?
 

Attachments

  • Diagram1.png
    Diagram1.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 594
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to see that this circuit must have some kind of load attached at a-b or else it will not be a correct circuit. Can you spot the contradiction that would arise if the terminals are left open?

Once you've satisfied yourself that this is the case, decide what kind of "load" you want to place on the circuit to facilitate analysis.

EDIT: Actually, it occurs to me that there is a valid solution obtainable for the open circuit voltage provided that a particular current value and voltage across the current source occurs. The value for the current can be arrived at by considering the "contradiction" I mentioned above and thinking through the implications.
 
gneill said:
You should be able to see that this circuit must have some kind of load attached at a-b or else it will not be a correct circuit. Can you spot the contradiction that would arise if the terminals are left open?

Once you've satisfied yourself that this is the case, decide what kind of "load" you want to place on the circuit to facilitate analysis.

EDIT: Actually, it occurs to me that there is a valid solution obtainable for the open circuit voltage provided that a particular current value and voltage across the current source occurs. The value for the current can be arrived at by considering the "contradiction" I mentioned above and thinking through the implications.

If the teriminals are left open, the current flowing through the resistor is Ix, and for the dependent source it is 0.5Ix. However, since they are in series, the current should be the same.

Hence Ix = 0 ? There is no current flowing through the loop? And the voltage between terminal a and b is just Vs?

Actually my instructor told me that the dependent current source will be "deactivated" in this case but I did not get it.
 
kexanie said:
If the teriminals are left open, the current flowing through the resistor is Ix, and for the dependent source it is 0.5Ix. However, since they are in series, the current should be the same.

Hence Ix = 0 ? There is no current flowing through the loop? And the voltage between terminal a and b is just Vs?
Yes, that is correct and well constructed logic.

Actually my instructor told me that the dependent current source will be "deactivated" in this case but I did not get it.
And now you do :smile:
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top