Voltage at Vab, balancing, Increasing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the voltage Vab in a circuit with given resistances and then balancing it to achieve Vab=0. The user successfully calculated Vab as 1.8 V but struggles with the balancing process and the subsequent increase of Vab by 2.75%. They provided equations for balancing the circuit but are uncertain if their calculations for the new resistor values are correct. The user expresses frustration with their understanding of circuit concepts, seeking clarification on the steps needed to complete the problem. Overall, the thread highlights challenges in applying theoretical knowledge to practical circuit analysis.
talaroue
Messages
302
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Statics2-1.jpg

R1=350 Ohms
R2=120 Ohms
R3=124 Ohms
R4=350 Ohms
A is between R1 and R4, while B is between R2 and R3. SORRY FOR NOT HAVING IT IN THE PICTURE
For the following circuit what is Vab? Now balance the circuit so Vab=0. After balancing what are the values of a shunt resistor which would increase Vab by 2.75% ( a shunt resistor is a resistor which is placed in parallel to another resistor in order to change its value.)


Homework Equations


Va=Vs R4(R1+R4)
Vb=Vs R3/(R2+R3)
Vab=Vb=Va




The Attempt at a Solution



So I basically have three parts to this problem. Find the value of Vab, then balance it, then increase it.

for the the first part to find the value of Vab

I just plug and chug for the above equations and got Va=2.5 V Vb=4.31 Vab=4.31-2.5=1.8 V that wasn't the hard part the hard part is that we didn't go over excatly how to do this but I found an example in the book but it just doesn't make since how to do the next two parts here is my work...if someone could do to things, tell me if I am right, and why! Because in physics its not really getting the right number it is why.

Balancing

R4=Rx
Rx=R1*R3/R2=(350*124)/120=362 Ohms

R2=Rx
Rx=R1*R3/R4=124 Ohms

R1=RX
RX=R2*R4/R3=339 Ohms

is that all I have to do? I realized that R3=Rx would be the same as R2 so i didn't think i had to change it but then I don't know what to do after that if there is another step.

THIRD PART increase Vab by 2.75%

I have no idea it has work but it doesn't make sense where it comes from can someone explain to me how to do this part

I AM HORRIBLE WITH CIRCUITS! I AM CIVIL NOT ELECTRICAL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any help would be awesome!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top