Voltage source -> Ideal switch -> Resistance = Reactive power

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a circuit comprising an ideal voltage source, an ideal switch, and an ideal resistance in series. The user is puzzled by the discrepancy between the apparent power from the voltage source and the effective power dissipated in the resistor, noting that the apparent power is significantly higher. Calculations indicate that the instantaneous power in the resistor aligns with Ohm's Law, suggesting no reactive component should exist. However, the user questions where the reactive power is going, especially when the switch is closed and power flows. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between voltage, current, and power in the circuit, while seeking clarity on the reactive power's behavior.
foges
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
This is a problem i just can't get my head around.

When you have a circuit consisting of a "Ideal Voltage source -> Ideal switch -> Ideal Resistance" all in series. The voltage source produces a sinusodal voltage and the switch is set to cut off a part of any rising curve:

http://img383.imageshack.us/img383/8819/picture2ixx.png

Now if you do the calculations for the effective power that is dissapated at the resistance and the apparent power given off by the voltage source you will see that the apparent power is quite a bit higher than the effective power (P = 0.89*S for alpha = pi/3, (see picture)).

P_R = I_{eff}^2\cdot R, S = I_{eff}\cdot U_{eff}

How does this happen? where is the reactive power going?PS: I have done all the calculations, I am not asking for those, I am looking for an explanation. Thanks :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The instantaneous power in a resistor is equal to the instantaneous voltage times the instantaneous current. These occur at the same time so there is no reactive component.
 
That would seem logical (what i thought), but check out the calculations (its in german, but shouldn't make much of a difference):

http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/4929/picture4w.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lots of luck with that...

The voltage across the resistor is the same as the voltage from the source when the switch is closed.
When the switch is open no power goes anywhere.

This is simple Ohms Law stuff. There is a voltage across a resistor and a current flowing in it. Why would there be any reactive component?
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top