Was My Approach to Solving the Physics Problem Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter agent_509
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Word problem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a cannonball's mass based on force, barrel length, and desired exit speed. The user calculated the correct mass of the cannonball as 11.56 kg but received points deducted for their approach. They used a vector-valued function to understand the work done along a path, combining gravitational and cannon forces, which complicated the solution unnecessarily. Feedback suggests that while the answer was correct, a simpler method would have sufficed. The user seeks confirmation on their understanding and approach for future complex problems.
agent_509
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are in charge of a cannon that exerts a
force 19000 N on a cannon ball while the ball
is in the barrel of the cannon. The length of
the cannon barrel is 1.92 m and the cannon is
aimed at a 37° angle from the ground.

The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2.

If you want the ball to leave the cannon
with speed v0 = 79.3 m/s, what mass cannon
ball must you use?

Homework Equations



W=∫C F•dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I already have done the problem, the answer is 11.56kg. My question is if the way I solved this problem was ok. i got several points docked for the way I answered it.

I wanted to make sure I understood the concept well enough to apply it to more complex problems, such as ones where the path taken by an object was not a straight line and the force varied with position, so I made the path taken into a vector valued function r(t) where 0≤t≤1 (t is arbitrary since I'm calculating work right?) and then combined the force of gravity with the force exerted by the cannon into a force field existing along the path taken by the cannonball. I calculated dr from the vector-valued function, and solved the line integral. Of course the whole thing only turned out to be the force dotted into the path taken by the cannonball anyways, but I was just trying to make sure I understood the concept.

So my question is this: is there something wrong with the way I solved the problem?

Edit: I meant "work problem" not word problem, my apologies.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You got the right answer, that is good. Sounds like you made the problem more complicated then it needed to be. Time is money, keep it simple.
 
I'm aware of that. Like I said I just wanted to make sure I understood how I could solve more complicated versions of the problem. thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top