Was My Approach to Solving the Physics Problem Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter agent_509
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Word problem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a cannonball's mass based on force, barrel length, and desired exit speed. The user calculated the correct mass of the cannonball as 11.56 kg but received points deducted for their approach. They used a vector-valued function to understand the work done along a path, combining gravitational and cannon forces, which complicated the solution unnecessarily. Feedback suggests that while the answer was correct, a simpler method would have sufficed. The user seeks confirmation on their understanding and approach for future complex problems.
agent_509
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are in charge of a cannon that exerts a
force 19000 N on a cannon ball while the ball
is in the barrel of the cannon. The length of
the cannon barrel is 1.92 m and the cannon is
aimed at a 37° angle from the ground.

The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2.

If you want the ball to leave the cannon
with speed v0 = 79.3 m/s, what mass cannon
ball must you use?

Homework Equations



W=∫C F•dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I already have done the problem, the answer is 11.56kg. My question is if the way I solved this problem was ok. i got several points docked for the way I answered it.

I wanted to make sure I understood the concept well enough to apply it to more complex problems, such as ones where the path taken by an object was not a straight line and the force varied with position, so I made the path taken into a vector valued function r(t) where 0≤t≤1 (t is arbitrary since I'm calculating work right?) and then combined the force of gravity with the force exerted by the cannon into a force field existing along the path taken by the cannonball. I calculated dr from the vector-valued function, and solved the line integral. Of course the whole thing only turned out to be the force dotted into the path taken by the cannonball anyways, but I was just trying to make sure I understood the concept.

So my question is this: is there something wrong with the way I solved the problem?

Edit: I meant "work problem" not word problem, my apologies.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You got the right answer, that is good. Sounds like you made the problem more complicated then it needed to be. Time is money, keep it simple.
 
I'm aware of that. Like I said I just wanted to make sure I understood how I could solve more complicated versions of the problem. thanks.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top