Wave on a Wire: Finding Equations and Tension

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~christina~
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wire
AI Thread Summary
A transverse wave on a taut wire is described with an amplitude of 0.200 mm, a frequency of 500 Hz, and a speed of 196 m/s. The wave equation can be expressed as y(x,t) = A sin(ωt - kx), where ω is calculated as 3151.59 rad/s and k is derived from the wave speed and mass density. To find the tension in the wire, the relationship v = √(T/ρ) is used, linking wave speed to tension and linear mass density. For calculating transverse velocity and acceleration at specific points, differentiation with respect to time is necessary, treating the spatial variable as constant. This method applies consistently for similar wave function problems.
~christina~
Gold Member
Messages
714
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Wave on a wire

Homework Statement


A transverse wave on a taut wire has amplitude of 0.200mm and a frequency of 500Hz. It travels with a speed of 196m/s.

a) write an equation in SI units of the form y(x,t)= Asin( \omega t- kx) for this wave

b)The linear mass density of this wire is 4.10g/m Find the Tension in the wire

c) what are the transverse velocity and the acceleration of the wave when x= 19.7m and t= 0.101s

Homework Equations


F= -kx
v= \omega/ k ==> teacher gave me this equation but I can't find it in the book...is it valid?
f= 1/T= \omega/ 2 \pi

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
f= 1/T= \omega/ 2 \pi

T= 0.002s

v= \omega/ k

2 \pi (500Hz)= \omega

\omega= 3151.59rad/s

k= \omega / v

3141.59rad/s / 196m/s= 16.02 => I'm not sure it's suppsosed to be that large

I guess I'd just plug in the numbers but I'm not sure if the way I got the numbers is correct.

b) I don't know how to find this

c) I think I would just differentiate the original equaiton with the numbers included and then just plug in the values given and find the numbers.

I have a question though.

Is the transverse velocity always found through the the differential equation?


Thank you very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part a looks ok. For part b, the speed of a wave on a string with tension T and mass per unit length \rho is:

v= \sqrt{\frac{T}{\rho}}

For part c you would just differentiate wrt time.
 
Kurdt said:
Part a looks ok. For part b, the speed of a wave on a string with tension T and mass per unit length \rho is:

v= \sqrt{\frac{T}{\rho}}

For part c you would just differentiate wrt time.

Oh okay.
Thanks a lot Kurdt :smile:
 
Kurdt said:
For part c you would just differentiate wrt time.

I have a Question about this don't I have to differentiate with respect to BOTH time and displacement?.. the problem said that I had to find the transverse veloicty and acceleration of the wave when x= 19.7m and t= 0.101s so how would I do this?

I know that I differentiate but I'm not sure how it would look if I differentiate with both x and t together...

I do know that if it's just t and theta then it would be

y(t)= A cos(\omega*t + \theta)

v(t)= y'(t)= -\omega A sin(\omega*t + \theta)

and

a(t)= v'(t)= -\omega^2 A cos(\omega t + \theta)

But what would it be with 2 variables??

would it be

y(x/t)= (8x -8a)((Asin (omega*t- kx)) ? =&gt; (for here sinc they start with sin<br /> Thank you Kurdt
 
Last edited:
You just differentiate wrt time. You treat the x variable as a constant when you do this. Then once you've differentiated you plug in the numbers.
 
Kurdt said:
You just differentiate wrt time. You treat the x variable as a constant when you do this. Then once you've differentiated you plug in the numbers.

alright. but does this apply always when they ask you these questions? do I just differentiate partially and then plug in?
 
~christina~ said:
alright. but does this apply always when they ask you these questions? do I just differentiate partially and then plug in?

Yes, that is the only way to find the transverse velocity and acceleration when you're given the wavefunction.
 
Kurdt said:
Yes, that is the only way to find the transverse velocity and acceleration when you're given the wavefunction.

Thank you Kurdt :smile:
 
Back
Top