Wavefunction and degree of localization

argonsonic
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that there is a wavefunction \Psi (x,0) where 0 is referring to t. Let us also say that a(k) = (C\alpha/\sqrt \pi )exp(-\alpha^2k^2) is the spectral contents (spectral amplitudes) where k is defined as wavenumber k. \alpha and C is some constant

My question is, why do we calculate \Delta x by looking at where the value of \Psi (x) diminish by 1/e from the maximum possible value of \Psi (x)?

Also, although the width of the \Psi (x) packet is 4\alpha, we define \Delta x as \alpha. Why is it like this?

Thanks.

Homework Equations


Fourier transform.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know why we use the 1/e value to define \Delta x, but I do know why we use \alpha as \Delta x. The Fourier transform of a complex function \Psi (x) is calculated by looking at the spectral contents (a(k)), where k is defined as wavenumber k. Since the spectral amplitude a(k) is a Gaussian shape with a width of 4\alpha, this means that the Fourier transform of \Psi (x) has a width of \alpha. Thus, \Delta x is defined as \alpha.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top