Wavefunction boundary condition solve for k

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the constant k in a wave function defined piecewise for x<0 and x>0, using boundary conditions. The context is within quantum mechanics, specifically related to wavefunctions and their continuity at boundaries.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the continuity of the wavefunction and its derivatives at the boundary x = 0. There are attempts to equate the wavefunctions and their derivatives to find k. Questions arise regarding the correctness of derivative calculations and the implications of the relative sizes of constants a and b.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on checking expressions and derivatives, while others have proposed different interpretations of the relationship between a, b, and k. Multiple perspectives on the implications of the constants' magnitudes are being explored, particularly in the context of a >> b and a << b.

Contextual Notes

There is a note of uncertainty regarding the signs of k and the nature of the constants a, b, and c, which may not be strictly positive or real. This raises questions about the assumptions being made in the problem setup.

zhillyz
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A wave function is given by:
\Psi (x) = a cos(2\pi x) + b sin (2\pi x) for\: x&lt;0 \\<br /> and\\<br /> \Psi (x) = Ce^{-kx} for\: x&gt;0 \\

Determine the constant k in terms of a, b and c using the boundary conditions and discuss the case a >> b.

Homework Equations



Wavefunctions and their first order derivatives are continuous at the boundaries. So at x = 0 they will equal each other.

The Attempt at a Solution



acos (2\pi x) + b sin(2\pi x) = Ce^{-kx}

sin 0 = 0 and cos 0 = 1 and exp 0 = 1 therefore;

a = C \\<br /> <br /> -(2\pi x)asin(2\pi x) + (2\pi x)bcos(2\pi x) = -ake^{-kx}

again sin 0 = 0 cos 0 = 1 exp 0 = 1 and x = 0 therefore;

-ak = 0

Soo pretty sure this is correct so far but not sure on the final step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your expressions for the derivatives of the sine and cosine functions. Did you use the chain rule properly?
 
Ahh forgot to get rid of the x so that would mean k = 2pi*b/a. And for cases where a<<b then it is just 2pi*b?
 
I get a different sign for k. The initial problem statement says to consider the case a >> b.

The question seems a little odd to me. The constants a, b, c need not be positive numbers (or even real for that matter.) Anyway, I guess you could make a conclusion about the size of k under the assumption that |a| >> |b|.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K