Wavelength from amplitude information?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the length of a vibrating string at its third-harmonic frequency, where the displacement is half the maximum amplitude at a specific point. The user initially misapplied the sine function by using degrees instead of radians, leading to incorrect calculations. After switching to radians, they found a significantly longer string length of 10.62 meters, which aligns with the correct application of the wave equation. The importance of using radians in scientific calculations is emphasized, as using degrees can yield erroneous results. Ultimately, the user confirms that the correct approach with radians produces a valid solution.
TheExibo
Messages
55
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A string vibrates at its third-harmonic frequency. The displacement at a point 59.0cm from one end is the first time the displacement is half the maximum amplitude. How long is the string?

Homework Equations



wavelength=(2(rope length))/nodes

y=Asin(kx)

k=2pi/wavelength

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
0.5A=Asin(kx)
kx=30

k(0.59m)=30
k=50.85

50.85=2pi/wavelength
wavelength=0.1236m

0.1236m=(2(rope length))/3
rope length=0.1854m

How is such a small rope length possible if 0.59m is half the distance from the first amplitude? What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have noticed that you have a point on the string that is beyond the length of the string ... this is a contradiction: therefore you did something wrong.
This could be arithmetic, maybe you had the calculator in DEG when it should be in RAD or other way?
It could be something to do with the way you reasoned your way through the problem: cannot tell because you don't say... but I did notice that you did your angles in degrees when you should have used radians.
The angles in all scientific formulas are in radians ...

Note: Best practise is to do all the algebra before you plug the numbers in.
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
You have noticed that you have a point on the string that is beyond the length of the string ... this is a contradiction: therefore you did something wrong.
This could be arithmetic, maybe you had the calculator in DEG when it should be in RAD or other way?
It could be something to do with the way you reasoned your way through the problem: cannot tell because you don't say... but I did notice that you did your angles in degrees when you should have used radians.
The angles in all scientific formulas are in radians ...

Note: Best practise is to do all the algebra before you plug the numbers in.

I used radians, and got a very long length for the wire. I only have one try left for answering my question, so I'm afraid to risk it. My reasoning was to find the wave number using y=Asin(kx) (this equation was suggested in another question, but I don't know if it is right since I've seen y=2Asin(kx) being used), then to use the wave number to find the wavelength, and use the resonance for closed-closed structures to find the length of the rope.
 
I found that y=Asin(kx) should be the correct one to use, and with radians, I get 10.62m. I'm still not sure
 
Never mind, the answer with the radians was correct. How come degrees wouldn't work though?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top