Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Waves Dispersion? can someone help explain?

  1. Apr 20, 2005 #1
    Hi i'm studying for a test, and in the suggested reading book review has a few equations that they talk about but i'm not dont really understand how it jumps from one thing to another? the book is very vauge..... I've broken the parts i dont understand into A,B,C (I used w = omega)

    A)IT shows a graph, explain that the end of a string is given a transverse displacement phi=cosw1t+cosw2t where the two frequencies are almost equal and w1>w2 the resultant motion is a travelling wave of angular frequency (w1+w2)/2, modulated by n envelope which is a travelling wave of (w1-w2)/2 There the speed of this envelop is (w1-w2)/(k1-k2) ....? I dont understand how they got that?

    B) A system with dipersion relation w=ak^r....a and r are constants because v(sub g)=xv(sub phi) at all wave frequencies. i duno where then got the other variables v(sub g)? i know that v(sub phi) =c(1+ak^2)^1/2 but i dont understand how they relate?

    C) a beaded string above cut off, the dependence of k on frequency is given by w=w(sub c) cosh1/2ka showing a graph, How does k depend on the frequency? i know a beaded string can exhibit high freq cut off and that the part od the system vibrates in anti phase with each other...and k=(pi/a)-ik where k can be found as a function by replacing k=pi/a in w/w(sub c)= sin (1/2 Ka-i1/2ka) but i'm not sure how?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 21, 2005 #2

    Meir Achuz

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    A) comes from the trig for cosw1t+cosw2t = (cos at)(cos bt) with
    a=(w1+w2)/2 and b=(w1-w2)/2.
     
  4. Apr 21, 2005 #3

    Meir Achuz

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    B) v_{phi}=w/k=ak^r/r=ak^{r-1}.
    v_g=dw/dk=rak^{r-1}=rv_{phi}.
    The x must be a misprint.
     
  5. Apr 21, 2005 #4

    Meir Achuz

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I'm not sure what you're asking. If you have w as a function of k in your first eq.,
    can't you just solve that for k? In this and in (B), you may be confusing two different situations.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Waves Dispersion? can someone help explain?
Loading...