What Am I Missing About the Centroid Equation for a Circular Segment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snurblet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centroid Circular
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the centroid of a circular segment using the equation \(\bar{y}=\frac{4Rsin^3\frac{\theta}{2}}{3(\theta-sin\theta)}\). The user attempts to apply this formula for a circular segment with a diameter of 1 inch and an angle of 60°, resulting in an unexpectedly small centroid distance. Concerns are raised about whether the calculations are correct, especially since a different formula for a semicircle yields reasonable results. It is noted that the angle should be expressed in radians, as 60 degrees is equivalent to \(\pi/3\) radians, which could impact the calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of proper unit conversion in centroid calculations.
snurblet
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to find the centroid of a circular segment. I know nothing of calculus, and this is part of an analysis for statics that goes beyond the material covered in class.


Homework Equations



I've seen this equation for calculating the centroid:

\bar{y}=\frac{4Rsin^3\frac{\theta}{2}}{3(\theta-sin\theta)}

Please the Wiki link for the diagram:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Circularsegment_centroid.svg


The Attempt at a Solution



For a circle of 1 inch diameter, with an angle of 60°:

4(0.5")sin(30)^3= 0.25

divided by:

3(60-sin60)≈ 177.4

Answer: approximately 0.001"

Surely the centroid should be within the segment? Separately, I've found the centroid of a semicircle using:

\bar{y}=\frac{4R}{3\pi}

which gave reasonable results. I'm led to believe the first equation should give the correct centroid position for a semicircle (θ=180°), but I also got a very small distance for that, too.

What am I missing about the first equation?

Thanks.







 
Physics news on Phys.org
θ should be expressed in radians. 60 degrees is π/3 radians.
 
Very gently stated. :)

Thanks, Chester!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top