What are the Electric Field Lines and Flux in Coaxial Cables?

AI Thread Summary
Coaxial cables consist of a central copper wire and an outer copper shell with insulation in between. The discussion focuses on understanding electric field lines and flux using Gauss' law, particularly in three scenarios based on the charge per unit length: when the inner wire's charge is greater than, equal to, or less than that of the outer shell. The electric field inside the conductor is zero, and the charge on the inner surface of the outer cylinder must balance the charge on the inner wire. The remaining charge on the outer surface of the cylinder is determined by the difference between the charges on the inner wire and the outer shell. Understanding these relationships through Gauss' law simplifies the analysis of electric fields in coaxial cables.
ussrasu
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I don't really understand Gauss' law - any help with this question would be appreciated?

Coaxial cables are made of a copper wire in the center and a concentric cylindrical shell of copper outside, with insulating material in between and outside the shell. The charge per unit length of the cable are given as λ1 (positive) in the inner wire and −λ2 (negative) in the outer shell.

Sketch qualitatively the electric field lines on a plane perpendicular to the cable assuming it is very long.
Consider three cases:
(a) λ1 > λ2,
(b) λ1 = λ2 and
(c) λ1 < λ2.

Explain your diagrams using the concepts of flux and Gauss' law.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The key to understanding Gauss's law is that a Gaussian surface is a completely made up surface that you use as a tool. Since we have a wire in this problem, a good surface that perfectly encloses the wire is a cylinder(minus the bases). The cylinder's surface area would be 2\pi r^2 where r is the radial distance from the wire.

Now Gauss's Law states that \int E \bullet dA=q/\epsilon_0 , where q is the charge enclosed by the imaginary surface you just created.

So if you want the electric field, but you have charge that's enclosed by any area, even one you just made up, you can use that equation to find the electric field.

It's really useful, and it makes these types of problems a breeze once you understand it.
 
What happens in each of the situations though? i.e in parts a) b) and c) - what is different in each of them? And how do you explain these observations in terms of Gauss' Law and Flux?

Thanks :smile:
 
(Charges are considered per unit length)

The E field within the conductor is zero therefore the flux originated from charge + \lambda_1 = \frac{\lambda_1} {\epsilon_0} is to be terminated on the inner surface of the outer cylinder and thus charge on the inner surface of outer cylinder must be - \lambda_1

But the total charge on the outer cylinder is - \lambda_2 hence the rest of the charge remain on the outer surface and will be

- \lambda_2 + \lambda_1

now I think you may find the correct answer for all three cases.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top