What Are the Energy Levels and Degeneracies in a 3D Infinite-Potential Well?

  • Thread starter Thread starter freefallin38
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d
freefallin38
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
For the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth levels of the three-dimensional cubical box, find the energies in terms of the quantity E0= π^2*hbar^2/(2mL^2), where m is the particle mass and L is the box's sidelength.
_____E0 (third level)
_____E0 (fourth level)
_____E0 (fifth level)
_____E0 (sixth level)
Which, if any, are degenerate?So the equation that I am using is E=E0*(n1^2+n2^2+n3^2), where n1, n2, n3 are energy levels. For third level, I used n1=1, n2=n3=2, so I got 9*E0. I thought that for 4th level I would just raise one level, making n1=n2=n3=2, and get 12*E0, but this doesn't work. Can anyone give me a hint as to what I'm doing wrong? Also, the third level will be degenerate, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget about n1=3, n2=n3=1, and its permutations.

Do you understand why the 3rd level is degenerate? That will be necessary to determine which of the 4th, 5th and 6th levels might be degenerate also.
 
Last edited:
right, thank you! the third level is degenerate because you can have different wave functions, because you could also have n1=n3=2, and n2=1, and so on, right? Then the fourth and sixth levels would also be degenerate.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top