What Are the Properties of First and Second Derivatives?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://i3.minus.com/j7uTkNLAl2aBy.png

Homework Equations



Extrema occur at critical points; critical points are either where the first derivative fails to exist or equals 0.

Horizontal tangent lines occur where the first derivative is 0.

Points of inflections occur when the concavity changes across a point.

The Attempt at a Solution



14) Yes, the original function has a horizontal tangent line at x = 2. The graph of the derivative is 0 at the specified point. The original function also has an inflection point because the derivative of the derivative changes sign from positive to negative.

15) No, the derivative is negative at x = -2 (the second tick mark on the x-axis to the left of the origin). It is concave up however since the derivative of the derivative is positive.

16) x = 0 is a critical point since the derivative is going to the infinities. However, the derivative to the left is positive; the derivative to the left is negative. It's a local maximum.

17) Yes; the second derivative is negative only from 2 to infinity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Qube said:

Homework Statement



http://i3.minus.com/j7uTkNLAl2aBy.png

Homework Equations



Extrema occur at critical points; critical points are either where the first derivative fails to exist or equals 0.
Corrected version:
Extrema occur at critical points; critical points are points in the domain of the function either where the first derivative fails to exist or equals 0.
Qube said:
Horizontal tangent lines occur where the first derivative is 0.

Points of inflections occur when the concavity changes across a point.

The Attempt at a Solution

I'm afraid you're missing some important ideas here. All of your answers are wrong.
Qube said:
14) Yes, the original function has a horizontal tangent line at x = 2. The graph of the derivative is 0 at the specified point. The original function also has an inflection point because the derivative of the derivative changes sign from positive to negative.
The function does have a horizontal tangent at x = 2, but there is NOT an inflection point here. An inflection point has to do with the second derivative changing sign, not the first derivative.
Qube said:
15) No, the derivative is negative at x = -2 (the second tick mark on the x-axis to the left of the origin). It is concave up however since the derivative of the derivative is positive.
No, the derivative is positive at x = -2. Notice that the derivative is positive all along the graph for x < 0. You should be able to look at the graph and see that the branch on the left is concave up and increasing.
Qube said:
16) x = 0 is a critical point since the derivative is going to the infinities. However, the derivative to the left is positive; the derivative to the left is negative. It's a local maximum.
The function is not defined at x = 0. A critical point has to be in the domain of the function - 0 is not in the domain of this function, so isn't a critical point, and isn't a local maximum. There are no local or global minima. The local maximum is at x = 2. There is no global maximum.
Qube said:
17) Yes; the second derivative is negative only from 2 to infinity.

Not true, because that's not the only interval. By inspection, you should be able to notice that the graph is concave down for x > 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait. That is the graph of f'(x) not f(x). I know it's a bit small and I'm trying to upload another picture right now. I really appreciate your going through my answers and I apologize since the little prime symbol is difficult to see in the original picture.

http://i3.minus.com/jbwsxB4NOJKivj.bmp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mark44 said:
Corrected version:
Extrema occur at critical points; critical points are points in the domain of the function either where the first derivative fails to exist or equals 0.

Correct. Critical points must exist in the domain of the original function. E.g. consider f(x) = 1/x. f'(x) = -x^-2. x = 0 appears to be a critical point but it does not exist in the domain of 1/x so it cannot be a critical point.
 
Qube said:
Wait. That is the graph of f'(x) not f(x). I know it's a bit small and I'm trying to upload another picture right now. I really appreciate your going through my answers and I apologize since the little prime symbol is difficult to see in the original picture.

http://i3.minus.com/jbwsxB4NOJKivj.bmp

OK, that changes things. I couldn't tell that what you first posted was the graph of f'. I'll take another look at your answers and get back to you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In light of the fact that the graph was of f', your answers seem correct to me.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top