What Are the Units of μ in a Variable Charge Density on a Rod?

TheLegace
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was just wondering if I had done this problem correctly

Take the rod axis to be the x-axis and the lefthand end of the rod to be x = 0. Assume
lambda is not constant but that lambda = μx where μ is a constant. What are the units of μ?
Find the force Vector F on the point charge q located a distance d from the righthand end of
the rod.

Homework Equations



dq= μxdx
dF = 1/4(pi)e_0 * (dq*q/d^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok well, to start I want to find what the constant μ units will be. I figure since lambda needs to be C/m, and x would be a function of displacement, then the units for μ would be C/m^2; when you take product μx = C/m.

Now to find the force, I figured I should the find the dq for the rod, dq=lambda*dx=μxdx
Which I am hoping is correct.

Now dF = 1/4(pi)e_0 * (dq*q/d^2). Now integrating from 0 to x yields
F=(μq/(d^2)8(pi)e_0) * x^2, now I work out the units they I get a Newton unit, so that helps me confirm that maybe I did it right. What I may have issues with is are my bounds for integration correct and is my statement about the radius squared in Coulombs law correct.

Any help would be appreciated, sorry if it is a bit difficult to read.

Thank You.
TheLegace
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How long is the rod? You don't say, so let's assume it is L. Your limits of integration should be from 0 to L. Also, if your charge element dq is at distance x from the origin, then its distance to the point charge will be (L - x + d). The square of that is what should be in your denominator.
 
kuruman said:
How long is the rod? You don't say, so let's assume it is L. Your limits of integration should be from 0 to L. Also, if your charge element dq is at distance x from the origin, then its distance to the point charge will be (L - x + d). The square of that is what should be in your denominator.

Thank You, I finally realized that since dq is being taken it will be subtracting the x, looking at geometry I was able to figure it out, but thank you very much.

Now is the integral easy to take? How would one take it?
 
One would find a substitution that works. For example, let u = L - x +d.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top