What bonding material is resistant to propanol?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a bonding material resistant to propanol for sealing a circuit. Participants suggest that thermoset polymers and electronics-grade RTV silicones or epoxies may offer some resistance, but caution that water vapor can still penetrate most materials over time. A metal can with insulated wires sealed with epoxy is recommended as a more reliable solution. Heat shrink tubing is deemed ineffective due to its porous structure, which allows solvents to pass through. Ultimately, the component may need to be treated as disposable due to the challenges posed by propanol and humidity.
bemaitea
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to figure out how to seal a circuit as described in this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2068433&posted=1#post2068433

My question to you chemical engineers, do you guys know of any sort of bonding material (like epoxy) which will not dissolve in porpanol?

I'm having a tough time water sealing this circuit with my materials because they all seem to fall apart after a period of time in propanol!

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
bemaitea said:
Hello,

I'm trying to figure out how to seal a circuit as described in this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2068433&posted=1#post2068433

My question to you chemical engineers, do you guys know of any sort of bonding material (like epoxy) which will not dissolve in porpanol?

Better described as a 'potting material' rather than a bonding agent. Any of the thermoset type of polymers will give you some resistance but you should keep in mind that your circuit will eventually come into contact with water vapor. Water resistance is a meaningless term in circuits like these since water vapor migrates through most materials (especially water resistant epoxies) and accumulates in the interior of the potted component. This component will eventually experience 100% relative humidity. A metal can is probably the best solution with tightly fitted electrically-insulated wires sealed with a bead of epoxy. Better yet a metal tube with the open end well away from the propanol/water solution... starting to sound more and more like an RTD metal probe.

I'm having a tough time water sealing this circuit with my materials because they all seem to fall apart after a period of time in propanol!

Thanks!

Propanol is only one facet of your problems! Heat shrink tubing is not the way to go even though it would appear to be a solution. The molecular structure of heat shrink tubing is very open... kind of like expanded metal fabric. Those openings can let a lot of stuff through. Even after applying heat, the structure is more or less an open mesh. Heat shrink was designed to be an electrical insulator, not a solvent/water resistant material!

Your choice of potting compound will probably be limited to RTV silicones (electronics grade only!) and epoxy. Allow the epoxy to cure normally (as you would treat your sensor)... don't accelerate the cure before testing since an accelerated cure will negatively impact solvent resistance. Plan on this component being a disposable item in your system.
 
hey chemisttree, thanks a lot for the very informative post!

I went over to ACE last night to try to find some RTV silicone, but alas it was a shot in the dark. I did, however, find a solution which seems to be holding up.

I describe it here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2070305&posted=1#post2070305

What's your take on that?
 
Hello! I've been brainstorming on how to prevent a lot of ferrofluid droplets that are in the same container. This is for an art idea that I have (I absolutely love it when science and art come together) where I want it to look like a murmuration of starlings. Here's a link of what they look like: How could I make this happen? The only way I can think of to achieve the desired effect is to have varying droplet sizes of ferrofluid suspended in a clear viscous liquid. Im hoping for the...
Hello everyone! I am curious to learn how laboratories handle in-house chip manufacturing using soft lithography for microfluidics research. In the lab where I worked, only the mask for lithography was made by an external company, whereas the mold and chip fabrication were carried out by us. The process of making PDMS chips required around 30 min–1 h of manual work between prepolymer casting, punching/cutting, and plasma bonding. However, the total time required to make them was around 4...
Back
Top