What Can You Deduce About EM Wave Transmissions in Your Experiment?

Sixty3
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a) A microwave transmitter T and receiver R are placed side by side facing two sheets of material M (aluminium) and N (hardboard). A very small signal is registered by R; what can you deduce about the experimental set up?

b) When M is moved towards N a series of maxia and minima is registered by R. Explain this and deduce the wavelength of the e-m waves emitted by T if the distance moved M between the second and seventh minimum is 70mm.

Any help with this question, also maybe if you could show how to work it out would be great !

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Sixty3, welcome to PF!:smile:

Sixty3 said:
also maybe if you could show how to work it out would be great !

Please re-read the site rules you agreed to when you signed up for your account. We do not do your homework for you. You need to make an effort, show your work/reasoning as clearly as possible, and explain where you are stuck.

As a hint to this problem, consider what happens when light strikes a good conductor (like say aluminum) at approximately normal incidence (the transmitter is facing the two sheets of material) and what happens when it strikes a (more or less linear) dielectric (like hardboard). How much is reflected/transmitted in each case?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top