What Causes a Pebble to Slip on a Rotating Wheel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhizKid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rolling Wheel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mechanics of a pebble slipping off a rotating wheel, specifically addressing the equations of motion in a non-rotating frame. The user initially misapplies the equations, leading to an incorrect relationship involving sine and cosine. A correction is suggested, indicating that the normal force equation should account for radial acceleration differently. The conversation emphasizes deriving a specific trigonometric relationship to align with the book's solution. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
PhizKid
Messages
477
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


QhxsP.png


only concerned with part (b)

Homework Equations


F = ma


The Attempt at a Solution


So first, just to visualize the problem a bit better, I transformed to the frame of an observer co - moving (but not rotating) with the wheel. Since the wheel is moving at constant speed this would just be a regular galilean boost and the equations of motion of the pebble will remain invariant under this transformation. In this frame, the wheel is simply rotating with angular velocity ω = V / R and not translating. Up until the pebble actually starts slipping relative to the wheel, it is constrained to move as one with the wheel so in this frame the pebble starts at the top of the wheel and sweeps out an angle θ right before sliding, simply by rotating about the center of the wheel. At this point on the wheel and in this frame, the equations of motion should be f - mgsin\theta = ma_{\theta } = 0 (since there is no tangential acceleration of the pebble as viewed in this frame) and N - mgcos\theta = ma_{r} = m\frac{V^{2}}{R}. Right before sliding we have that f = \mu N = N so we can solve the two and get sin\theta - cos\theta = \frac{V^{2}}{Rg}. This is not correct as you can see by what the book gives as the answer in the problem statement. I'm really not sure where the 1/√2 factors come in before taking any cosines of angles. The only way I could see them coming in is if the problem involved an isosceles triangle in some way. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Based on the way you wrote down your laws of motion, I assume you took the outward radial direction to be positive. Therefore you seem to have made a small typo as it should be N - mgcos\theta = -m\frac{V^{2}}{R} which results in cos\theta - sin\theta = \frac{V^{2}}{Rg} in actuality. That being said, try to derive the following trig relationship: cos\theta - sin\theta = \sqrt{2}sin(\frac{\pi }{4} - \theta ) = \sqrt{2}cos(\frac{\pi}{2} - (\frac{\pi }{4} - \theta)) = \sqrt{2}cos(\frac{\pi }{4} + \theta). If you can derive that then you have gotten the form the book wants.
 
Thank you
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top