What causes electric charges? Repulsion and attraction?

MoonCream
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm an undergraduate biologist student. I was studying chemical bond, but, while trying to understand it, I couldn't really get what causes the electric charges, what seems essential to me. So, someone can explains, in the simplest way as possible, what is electric charge? What causes it? Why there is repulsion and attraction? In my searches I found out something about virtual photons, hypercharge, weak isospin, vacuum, but I couldn't really follow what it meant because it was in a high technical language. Thank you in advance, and sorry if I'm not posting this question in the right place :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MoonCream said:
Hi, I'm an undergraduate biologist student. I was studying chemical bond, but, while trying to understand it, I couldn't really get what causes the electric charges, what seems essential to me. So, someone can explains, in the simplest way as possible, what is electric charge? What causes it? Why there is repulsion and attraction? In my searches I found out something about virtual photons, hypercharge, weak isospin, vacuum, but I couldn't really follow what it meant because it was in a high technical language. Thank you in advance, and sorry if I'm not posting this question in the right place :)

Well, a lot can be said about electric charge and electromagnetism in particle physics, but when it comes right down to it, there is really no answer that doesn't just shift the question of "why is nature this way?" to a more difficult technical place, and which is not really much more philosophically satisfying than your current question.

Electric charge just "is". It is one of the fundamental ingredients that we put into our models, as a postulate, and then explain the rest of the world using it (I lie a little bit but not very much). To go beyond this, we really have to start looking towards grand unified theories and string theory or something.

There is an interview Feynman once did with the BBC in which he tries to explain the difficulty with such questions, it is really quite wonderful, I highly recommend watching it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMFPe-DwULM

It is a deep rabbit-hole you are peering down, and physicists are not actually so much further down it than you might think. They are just much better at explaining 'how' all these things work. If you want to know more about 'how', we can certainly go there.
 
Thank you for the reply :smile: I never saw that particular Richard Feynman's video, and I really admire him, so, it was great seeing my question being discussed there.
Well, I understand what you said, I guess, and somehow I knew it was a trick question by the start. I still have curiosity about electric charges, electromagnetism, photons, light and all, of course, but I suppose it's too complex to go really deeper without having a good physics knowledge beforehand.
Anyway, if someone has any new information to share about the subject, it would be amazing :) I'll never have a full answer, naturally, it probably doesn't exist, but understanding a little more is always great. Like, what's the connection between virtual photons and electric charges? etc. ( maybe this question is kinda already wrong, I don't know, I just read it somewhere and may be confusing myself)
 
MoonCream said:
Thank you for the reply :smile: I never saw that particular Richard Feynman's video, and I really admire him, so, it was great seeing my question being discussed there.

No problem.

MoonCream said:
I still have curiosity about electric charges, electromagnetism, photons, light and all, of course, but I suppose it's too complex to go really deeper without having a good physics knowledge beforehand.

It depends what kind of detail you want to know things in. I think you can get the basic gist of it all with even a high-school level of physics knowledge, with a little work.

MoonCream said:
Like, what's the connection between virtual photons and electric charges

Well your electric charges create electric fields (and magnetic ones if they move), and the simple thing to say is that at the quantum level we can describe electromagnetic fields as being made of virtual photons. It is a little bit tricky because virtual photons mostly make sense at reasonably high energies and with very weak fields, and usual classical electric and magnetic fields are nothing of the sort, but the picture can still be somewhat helpful.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top