What Causes Standing Waves and Beat Frequencies in Sound?

penza
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Which one of the following situations could result in a standing wave?
A- Two waves with different frequencies moving in the same direction.
B- Two waves with different frequencies moving in opposite direction.
C- Two identical waves moving in opposite directions
D- Two identical waves moving in the same direction.

Two sound waves of frequencies 250.0 Hz and 250.1 Hz are generated. To determine the beat frequency an observer must wait at least
A- 0.004S
B-0.1S
C- 1S
D-10S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
-1- What is the most common way that standing waves are generated?

-2- What is the frequency of the beat? What does that tell you about how long it takes you to detect that beat frequency?
 
berkeman said:
-1- What is the most common way that standing waves are generated?

-2- What is the frequency of the beat? What does that tell you about how long it takes you to detect that beat frequency?
the most common way i don't know...and the frequency of beat is 1/F
 
(1) What is a stading wave? How would you define it?

(2) No the beat frequency is given by the difference in frequency of the two waves thus; fbeat = |f2 - f1| . This can be derived from the wave equations of the two interfering waves. Do you know what causes the beating? If not I suggest you look at http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sound/beat.html"

Edit: Sorry berkeman if I stepped on your toes, but you were 'offline'
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top