What causes the bending of this rod?

AI Thread Summary
The bending of the rod during angular acceleration is attributed to the development of internal moments necessary for the upper portion to achieve angular acceleration. This internal moment arises from external forces applied at the base, which create axial, shear, and bending forces throughout the rod. Understanding these forces requires analyzing a free body diagram of the rod's lower section, where internal forces are transferred from the base to the upper part. Calculating these internal forces involves applying equations of motion, but can be complex due to the rod's bending nature. Overall, the interaction of these forces is crucial for understanding the rod's deformation during rotation.
jerronimo3000
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
In this video, a man applies an angular acceleration to the base of a rod. While the rod rotates, it bends. Why? What force is there that causes the bending, aside from rod's own weight? It seems to me to be the work of a fictitious inertial force. I was always taught that those forces don't actually do anything, yet the rod is clearly deforming. Am I missing some other force, or am I misunderstanding inertial forces? Also, in this simple case, how would one go about computing the stress at the base of the rod?



Edit: Here's the same video, without the lines and data:

 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It bends in order to develop the internal moment required to cause the upper portion to have an angular acceleration. If there were no bending, there would be no internal moment, and the upper part would not rotate.
 
Could you elaborate on internal moment? I'm not sure I'm grasping what you mean.
 
Imagine that you cut the rod at a distance s from the bottom end. On the bottom end, you have external forces creating a moment on the rod. Treat this lower section of the rod as an isolated free body. On that FBD, show the external forces/moments dues to the users hands, and on the upper end show (1) an axial force, (2) a shear force, and (3) a bending moment. These represent the forces and moment transferred up to move the upper part of the rod. These are called internal forces and moment. They are internal to the rod considered as a whole, but external to the FBD of the lower part only. Note that s can be anywhere, that is, the cut can be anywhere along the length of the rod. The values of the forces and moment vary with s, but they exist everywhere.
 
Ah, I think I understand better. Thank you.

How does one calculate the axial force, shear force, and bending moment at each point along the rod?
 
For the free body as I described it previously, you apply F = M*a and T = Ic *alpha and solve for the internal forces. It can be tricky, and not the easiest thing to explain. It is particularly awkward for something bendy like this fly rod where the motion is difficult to describe. It is much easier to get internal forces after you know the motion of the rod.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top