What Causes the Short Lifetime of Neutral Pions in Strong Interactions?

noospace
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm having trouble understanding the short lifetime on the neutral pion. I understand that in the residual strong interaction between nucleons, the range of the virtual pion is limited by Heisenberg's uncertainty relation for energy, which thus limits its lifetime. I don't understand why this would be the case in other interactions such as \pi^0 \to 2\gamma where the pion is not virtual.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a homework problem?

The lifetime of the real neutral pion is greater then the life time of a virtual pion. The neutral pion decays since it consits of a quark-anti quark pair of the same pair. And eventually, they will anihilate. In contrast with the case of the virutal pions in the pion-exchange model of the strong force.

here's some more info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion
 
Interesting. Why is a quark anti-quark pair belonging to the same pair more likely to decay than one belonging to different pairs?
 
The neutral pion can decay through the electromagnetic force, the quarks and anti quarks from the same family can anihilate; and the electromagnetic force is stronger (more likley to occur) than the weak force.

The negative pion for instance, must decay through the weak force; via exchange of W-boson. As you can see in the Feynman diagrams for each process.

When particles decay, and react, certain quantities must be conserved. In our macroscopical world; we see that energy, linear and angular momentum must be conserved. In the microscopical world, things like "lepton number", "baryon number" etc must be conserved, and which quantities that must be conserved is also depented on which force that is acting. In electromagnetic, Isospin is not conserved, and in weak; Parity is not conserved. etc.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top