What Determines the Radial Acceleration of a Swinging Ball?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the radial acceleration of a ball swinging in a vertical circle. The user expresses confusion regarding the solution manual's approach to calculating radial acceleration and velocity components, specifically questioning the method of resolving vectors. There is a debate about the correct application of Pythagorean theorem for finding resultant acceleration and the relationship between tangential acceleration and the angle of the rope. The user emphasizes the importance of correctly resolving both radial and tangential components to accurately determine acceleration. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of vector resolution in physics problems related to circular motion.
twoods
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I am reviewing for the Physics GRE and am perplexed by this problem:

Homework Statement


A ball swings in a vertical circle at the end of a rope 1.5m long. When the ball is 36.9 degrees past the lowest point on its way up, its total acceleration is (-22.5, 20.1)m/s^2. At this instant (a) sketch a vector diagram showing the components of its acceleration, (b) determine the magnitude of its radial acceleration, and (c) determine the speed and velocity of the ball.


Homework Equations


a_c = v^2/R
sin(angle) = opposite/hyp.
cos(angle) = adjacent/hyp.

The Attempt at a Solution


See attached images.

I agree with the solutions I have attached for part (a), but not for (b) or (c). Especially how the solution manual determines the components of the radial acceleration in part (b) and direction of velocity in part (c).
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    14 KB · Views: 5,517
  • Photo on 2012-05-19 at 14.45.jpg
    Photo on 2012-05-19 at 14.45.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 4,715
Physics news on Phys.org
Reading this has made me question my own knowledge. For part b) I've always been told to work out the square root of the sum of each component squared. In this case, that will be \sqrt{22.5^{2}+20.2^{2}} which is about 30.2 m s^-2. I've never heard of the method stated in the solution.

For part c) the direction at that given point is tangent to the circle like you said and the tangent makes the angle 36.9 with the horizontal, and you've have used the same method to work out the velocity as stated in the solution and that's correct.
 
Any vector can be replaced(resolved) to minimum of 2 vectors.
The book resolved the horizontal to tangential and radial
The vertical acceleration too is resolved to radial and tangential.
You can also resolve the radial to horizontal and vertical componets.

In your solution which is wrong,
1. You resolve ar1 to vertical only. 3=2+1. Never 3=2
2. Only one radial acceleration. You can resolve this acceleration to vertical AND horizontal. Remember the word AND when resolving vectors.
 
Thank y'all for the replies!

Azizlwl, I solved for the hypotenuse of the "acceleration triangles" - so the radial parts - not the vertical parts - and added them together.

Does this not work?
 
Is the solution wrong? How is the angle of the rope related to the tangential acceleration anyway?


Edit: Whoops I didn't read the question.
 
Sythical said:
Reading this has made me question my own knowledge. For part b) I've always been told to work out the square root of the sum of each component squared. In this case, that will be \sqrt{22.5^{2}+20.2^{2}} which is about 30.2 m s^-2. I've never heard of the method stated in the solution.

For part c) the direction at that given point is tangent to the circle like you said and the tangent makes the angle 36.9 with the horizontal, and you've have used the same method to work out the velocity as stated in the solution and that's correct.

The radial acceleration has to point towards the center of the circle. If you use Pythagoras Theorem the resulting acceleration will probably point somewhere else.

If you have to use Pythagoras Theorem then you'll need to find the values of tangential acceleration and the net acceleration before you can find the radial acceleration. And obviously you don't have tangential acceleration.

See the right diagram:
http://buphy.bu.edu/~duffy/PY105/15g.GIF
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top