Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the interpretation of tick marks on closed contours in topographic maps, specifically whether these contours indicate hills or depressions. Participants explore the implications of contour markings in various contexts, including physical mapping and geological features.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that the isolated curves may indicate hills based on the surrounding landscape, but others argue that this is not certain and that they could also represent dips.
- One participant references a source indicating that depressions should have tick marks on the low side, while mountains do not, suggesting a standard practice in cartography.
- There is a question about the specific type of tick marks used and whether they are applicable to depth charts, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their usage in different contexts.
- A participant describes a specific landscape and hypothesizes that the closed contours are likely raised limestone spires rather than depressions, raising questions about local geological conditions.
- Another participant notes that closed contours representing depressions are distinguished by tick marks on the downhill side, particularly in karst landscapes.
- There is a discussion about the treatment of depressions in underwater topography, with references to how tick marks may or may not be used in such contexts.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the interpretation of tick marks and closed contours, with no consensus reached on their definitive meanings or applications across different types of maps.
Contextual Notes
Some statements rely on specific cartographic conventions that may vary by region or type of map, and there is uncertainty regarding the presence and significance of tick marks in digital mapping tools.