What do the tick marks on closed contours indicate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Map
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around creating a physical 3D map of a landscape characterized by isolated curves that lack altitude information. Participants explore how to interpret these curves, questioning whether they represent hills or dips. The consensus suggests that while the rising landscape indicated in magenta likely points to hills, certainty is elusive without additional data. The importance of tick marks on contour lines is highlighted, as they indicate depressions; however, the absence of these marks on the mountains raises doubts. The conversation also touches on the rarity of depressions in topography and the characteristics of closed contours, noting that they typically signify raised features rather than dips. Participants emphasize the value of color coding in maps for clarity and discuss the nuances of interpreting contour lines, particularly in relation to geological features like karst landscapes and sinkholes. The complexity of mapping techniques and the challenges of verifying digital representations are acknowledged, underscoring the intricacies of cartography.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,839
Reaction score
7,834
I'm trying to make a physical 3D map of this landscape.

These isolated curves (red) have no altitude on them, so it's up to me to interpret.

How do I know if these are hills or dips?

Can I gather from the rising landscape (marked in magenta) that these are probably hills?
Can I be sure?
test.png
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Huh. I don't see how you COULD know. It certainly seems likely that they are above the surrounding territory, but that's not a given. It would be perfectly correct to draw the landscape that way if they were dips.
 
Google Earth or Map? Usually you can just "feel" it from the contours. Interesting.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913 and Borg
hutchphd said:
According to this source
http://geokov.com/Education/mountain-pass-cliff.aspxIf it is a depression it should have tick marks on the low side. I do remember seeing these on charts. The mountains have no tick marks.
Those cartographers are careful folks.
Interesting. What kind of tick marks? Can you show an example?
 
phinds said:
Interesting. What kind of tick marks? Can you show an example?
It's at the bottom of the page on his link.
 
But I don't think depth charts use the tick marks for bottom contours. It would probably make them too "busy" but I don't know that they differentiate them. They are color coded for shallows so its usually easy to tell.
Anybody know?
 
hutchphd said:
According to this source
http://geokov.com/Education/mountain-pass-cliff.aspxIf it is a depression it should have tick marks on the low side. I do remember seeing these on charts. The mountains have no tick marks.
Those cartographers are careful folks.
Thank the heck out of you! Of course!

(Alas, these are digital maps from Toporama. I'm not sure if they're actually showing that symbol. And it's very difficult to verify.)Now that I think about it, depressions are a comparatively rare artifact - especially if not water-filled or at least marshy. 99.9% of small, closed-contour land features are going to be bumps.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
In the top left is a gully, cut into a scarp. It feeds an alluvial fan at the foot of the scarp, that fan has a gentle slope and covers the local bedrock. In the lower right, the distinctive lack of chevron patterns made by streams in valleys, makes it look like a karst landscape. I would expect sinkholes with such a geology, but those isolated and closed contours appear to be on steadily sloping ground, which suggests they are more likely to be raised limestone spires = hills.
I wonder, what is the local rainfall?
 
  • #11
From this map, it appears to be treated the same way.
hutchphd said:
But I don't think depth charts use the tick marks for bottom contours. It would probably make them too "busy" but I don't know that they differentiate them. They are color coded for shallows so its usually easy to tell.
Anybody know?
I checked a chart online and it appears that depressions in the local topography are treated the same underwater. It's been a while since I did any cartography but think about it this way. If there was no water, where would you start creating tick marks? Certainly not at the 'shoreline' that doesn't exist.

https://www.mindat.org/glossary/depression_contour
A closed contour, inside of which the ground or geologic structure is at a lower elevation than that outside, and distinguished on a map from other contour lines by hachures marked on the downslope or downdip side.
 
  • #12
A bit of clarifying colour banding helps clear it up.

test2.png


I'm glad I took the time to colour the whole thing. I would have been hopelessly lost pretty quickly if I hadn't.
 

Attachments

  • test3.png
    test3.png
    74.3 KB · Views: 539
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #13
Closed contours that represent depressions have tick marks on the downhill side. This is only true of closed contours. You can see such features on karst features such as sinkholes. Being a caver, I often peruse topo maps online for such features to find caves. You can find many such features on topo maps of N. Florida just south of Tallahassee where there are many sinks.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes davenn
  • #14
DBO said:
Closed contours that represent depressions have tick marks on the downhill side. This is only true of closed contours.
Under what conditions are contours not closed? 😕
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, Bystander and phinds

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top