What Does 2-Butanol Form with Trifluoroacetic Anhydride?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Organic Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The reaction between trifluoroacetic anhydride and 2-butanol, a secondary alcohol, is expected to yield sec-butyl trifluoroacetate. This outcome is consistent with the behavior of primary alcohols, as the reaction mechanism does not significantly differ between primary and secondary alcohols. The only potential variation would arise from steric hindrance, which is not a concern in this case. Therefore, the initial guess of sec-butyl trifluoroacetate as the product is valid. The discussion confirms that secondary alcohols can react similarly to primary alcohols with trifluoroacetic anhydride.
phish
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What would be the product of the reaction between trifluoroacetic anhydride and 2 butanol. This is a secondary alcohol. When a primary alcohol like methanol reacts with trifluoroacetic anhydride it forms methyl trifluoroacetate, but what 2 butanol form with it? I tried and got sec-butyl trifluoroacetate -this was sort of a guess.

Thanks in advance

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
phish said:
When a primary alcohol like methanol reacts with trifluoroacetic anhydride it forms methyl trifluoroacetate, but what 2 butanol form with it? I tried and got sec-butyl trifluoroacetate -this was sort of a guess.
It's a good guess. There's no reason to expect an anhydride reaction to be vastly different for primary alcohols and secondary alcohols. The only time this would be a factor is if there were some extreme steric hindrance that made the secondary alcohol reaction kinetically or thermodynamically prohibitive (but not the first).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top