What Does Column n-Tuple Mean in Vector Spaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vanckzhu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Column
vanckzhu
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Yet another silly question from me :/. From an instructor's notes: "Let V = R^n be the vector space of column n-tuples of real numbers." Not quite sure what the "tuple" means. For R^3, would an example be the transpose of (1,2,3)?

Thanks in advance for responding. While we're at it, any recommendations for online resources regarding dual spaces? These notes are a bit confusing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that's exactly what it is. An n-tuple is just a list of n numbers. So a 3-tuple would be something of the form (x,y,z) and a 4-tuple would be something of the form (w,x,y,z).
 
A "column n-tuple" is simply an n-tuple written as a column. A column "3-tuple" would be somthing like
\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 2 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}
where a row "3-tuple" would be
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\end{bmatrix}.

The distinction is important when working with matrices. If A is an n by n matrix then "Av" is defined for v a column n-tuple while "vA" is define for v a row n-tuple.
 
HallsofIvy said:
A "column n-tuple" is simply an n-tuple written as a column. A column "3-tuple" would be somthing like
\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 2 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}
where a row "3-tuple" would be
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 2 & 3\end{bmatrix}.

The distinction is important when working with matrices. If A is an n by n matrix then "Av" is defined for v a column n-tuple while "vA" is define for v a row n-tuple.

Thanks for the detailed explanation :).
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top