What does the Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}_{eff}$ describe in particle physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter beans73
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
beans73
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I've been given the following lagrangian:

\mathcal{L}_{eff} = \bar{\psi}(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} - m)\psi - \frac{G}{4}(\bar{\psi}\psi)(\bar{\psi}\psi)

where I have been told that the coefficient G is real and has mass dimension -2.
I will eventually need to derive the feynman rules for this, but I just wanted to ask what exactly it is describing. the first part looks like the lagrangian for a dirac spinor, and i guess would contribute a propagator. what is the second term describing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second term is an interaction between four fermions (two fermions and two anti fermions). It will allow the fermions to scatter off each other (two incoming (anti-)fermions scattering and producing two outgoing (anti-)fermions can be generated by a four-point interaction like the one in this Lagrangian). Without interaction terms in the Lagrangian, We would have fermions that do not interact with each other. Easy, but not very interesting. Ultimately that Lagrangian turns out to be non-renormalizable but that's for you to find out later in your studies, I suppose.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top