What happens if the pressure in a pressurizer exceeds 15MPa?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matt222
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
AI Thread Summary
An increase in pressure beyond the typical 15 MPa in a pressurizer, particularly during a station blackout, poses risks primarily related to the integrity of the pressure boundary rather than immediate core meltdown. Safety relief valves are designed to activate around 17.2 MPa to prevent overpressurization, protecting components like the reactor coolant pump seals from rupture and potential coolant loss. While the reactor would trip and shut down in response to an overpressure signal, the primary concern is maintaining structural integrity to avoid fission product release. The design includes mechanisms to manage pressure, including controlled steam release and backup cooling systems. Overall, while high pressure is dangerous, the system is engineered to handle such scenarios effectively.
matt222
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
I have question regarding the pressure of the pressurizer, for PWR the primary pressure is around 15MPa, what will happen if the pressure increase beyond 15MPa let's say around 20 to 50 MPa, in the case of station black out, in my point of view this due to loss of heat sink, what scenario migh occur due to this increase
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are safey relief valves that are set to limit the pressure in the primary coolant circuit, in order to protect the pressure vessel, piping, steam generators and reactor coolant pumps.

The setpoint is typically about 2500 psia (172 bar or 17.2 MPa) but could be slightly higher or lower. Other components would be designed with margin so their rating might be more like 2800 to 3000 psia (19.3 to 20.6 MPa).

Industry Performance of Relief Valves at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants through 2007
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/contract/cr7037/cr7037.pdf
 
yes I know about this limits in the pressure, so is that mean the reactor vessel would melt down if the pressure of the pressurizer went beyond 20Mpa or so
 
matt222 said:
yes I know about this limits in the pressure, so is that mean the reactor vessel would melt down if the pressure of the pressurizer went beyond 20Mpa or so
No. The core/fuel would not melt as a result of overpressurization. Rather, an overpressurization event could result in a rupture in the pressure boundary (e.g., reactor coolant pump seals) such that one would have a small (or large) leak, or a loss of coolant.

The objective in limiting the overpressurization is to protect the pressure boundary of the primary system and preclude damage to the system that would compromise the structural integrity of the system and otherwise compromise continued operation of the plant or increase the risk for release of fission products to containment. The safety valves allow for a controlled release of steam and relief of pressure.

If the reactor is operational and the control system receives an over pressure signal, the reactor trips, the unit shuts down, and additional cooling systems are brought online.
 
There's a control system with sprays to control pressure as Astro says.
Ultimate releif valve is reactor head bolts stretch.
Compare wetted area of head to cross sectional area of head bolts and their tensile strength. I think you'll find it's designed to lift head slightly before 3206, water's critical point. We hydro'd ours to 3106 just 100 psi shy.

EDIT i know at first that sounds scary. But think a minute - that's a leak that you know where it is and it's well above the fuel. Seems a smart place to build in a control of last resort.

You sure wouldn't want the bottom to blow out first.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top