How Does the Vector Triangle Principle Apply to Different Physical Quantities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle Vector
AI Thread Summary
The Vector Triangle Principle states that vectors such as velocity, force, and momentum can be represented as directed lines forming a closed triangle, adhering to the Vector Law of Addition. This principle applies to both regular vectors and pseudovectors, ensuring that their combinations yield a resultant vector only if they can form a closed shape. In the context of velocities, all measurements are relative, and the addition of relative velocities can be represented similarly. For forces, when the net force is zero, a vector triangle can illustrate the balance of forces acting on a body. The discussion also raises a question about the relationship between velocity and momentum triangles in binary oblique elastic collisions.
Messages
19,791
Reaction score
10,748
Definition/Summary

Vectors (such as velocity or force or momentum) obey the Vector Law of Addition.

That means in particular that combination of two vectors \vec{V}_1 and \vec{V}_2 is a vector \vec{V}_3 only if three directed lines (lines with arrows) \vec{L}_{AB} \vec{L}_{BC} and \vec{L}_{AC} can be drawn representing the vectors so as to make a closed triangle with the arrows going from A to B, from B to C, and from A to C.

Similarly, three vectors will add to zero only if three directed lines representing them can be drawn so as to make a closed triangle with the arrows going the same way round the triangle.

(And similarly for n vectors, and closed n-sided polygons.)

Pseudovectors (such as angular momentum) also obey the Vector Law of Addition, in exactly the same way as vectors.

Equations

\vec{V}_{AB}\ +\ \vec{V}_{BC}\ =\ \vec{V}_{AC}

\vec{V}_{AB}\ +\ \vec{V}_{BC}\ +\ \vec{V}_{CA}\ = 0

Extended explanation

Velocities:

Remember: technically, there is no such thing as an absolute velocity.

All velocities are relative velocities, between one object (or observer) and another.

Very often, one of those objects is the ground! :smile:

To make sure that the arrows are the right way round, give each relative velocity two letters, representing the two objects whose relative velocity it represents.

For example, \vec{V}_{WB} and \vec{V}_{GW} for "Water to Boat" and "Ground to Water", representing the velocity of a boat relative to the water, and of the water relative to the ground.

Then:

\vec{V}_{GW}\ +\ \vec{V}_{WB}\ =\ \vec{V}_{GB}

Similarly, you might use Ground Wind and Plane:

\vec{V}_{GW}\ +\ \vec{V}_{WP}\ =\ \vec{V}_{GP}

Forces:

When the change of momentum (acceleration) of a body is zero, Newton's second law means that the vector sum of the forces on that body is zero.

So a vector triangle (or polygon) may be used.

(The difference between a vector triangle (or polygon) and an FBD, or "Free-Body Diagram", is that the vectors in an FBD are all drawn starting at the same point, and Cartesian coordinates are used to determine that they add to zero.)

Before you draw any vector triangle for forces:

i] decide which body the forces are acting on (it must always be the same body)

ii] then draw extra lines with arrows on the diagram of the actual situation, to show the forces on that body.

iii] then draw the vector triangle (or polygon) separately, taking care that the arrows go round the triangle (or polygon) the same way! :smile:

Momenta:

In a collision, we treat all the bodies involved as being one (non-rigid) body.

Then there are no (external) forces on that one body, and so Newton's second law means that the change of momentum of that body is zero.

And therefore the vector sum of the individual momenta making up that body is zero.

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Jared Edington
Physics news on Phys.org
Do binary oblique elastic collisions lead to velocity triangles in all cases, just as they lead to momenta triangles? Or, are there exceptions where the velocities do not form a triangle while the momenta do?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top